Men Rights India

Fight against Legal Terrorism

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » Men Rights » How to safeguard from false cases by wife–Part 1

How to safeguard from false cases by wife–Part 1

15 Apr 2016 By videv 16 Comments

“How should I safeguard myself and my parents from false cases?” – is one of the most common question raised by men — after having given a brief or not so brief write-up of their story of abuse/threats/false allegations/insults/humiliation at the hands of wife.

👉(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act 👈
Contents hide
1 Basics of how laws were made for protection of married women
2 So why can’t one safeguard from false cases already filed or to be filed by wife?
3 Can an affidavit from wife protect from further false cases?
4 Can I safeguard myself by filing counter-cases?
5 RCR is not a safeguard, it’s a trap

In many of these instances, the husband and family are already facing multiple cases filed against them, so the question about how-to-safeguard seems to be after the fact.  Maybe many people are scared and expecting the skies to fall down as the cases progress forward, so whatever may be the individual feelings, the question about how-to-safeguard still remains there, waiting to be asked, and probably any answer will not be able to satisfy them fully.

The intention behind their question is not merely to find out about how to fight the cases in court, or how to get anticipatory bail etc.  Their likely intention is to find out how to nip the problem in bud – no cases should be filed, no calls by police, no fear of arrest whatsoever, no need to visit court, maybe what ‘counter-case’ they can file to safeguard etc.  At least those are the hidden questions.

So let me make a humble — or not so humble if it seems so to people, because some people will always be cribbing, and at least I have an audience but these critics don’t – attempt at answering this question: “How to safeguard from false cases from wife?” .

The short answer is: You can’t.  You CANNOT safeguard yourselves/your parents, and add to it possibly brother/sister, brother/sister-in-law, uncle/aunts, in some cases nephews/nieces, in rare cases the family dog (e.g. refer case of Mr Somnath Bharti’s poor dog) fully or 100% from false cases from wife.

Let me put above sentence in shorter form once again by lessening the verbiage: You CANNOT safeguard yourselves or your relatives fully or 100% from false cases from wife.

If there are any HC or SC lawyers or judges who think otherwise, we would love to hear from them.  Chances are, the higher up you go in judiciary, the more flexible spines are there to be seen when it comes to giving clients advice on marital related cases.  “Don’t appear to be adamant against wife” seems to be one such piece of ‘sage’ advice, as if being ‘adamant’ to go through a trial based on evidences rather than mere allegations was against principles of justice and a crime by itself!  Or maybe the real reason is the the lack of experience of the advisor in having defended men and their families in marital related cases.   Most of their experience seems to be in cutting deals.  The practice of higher judiciary in liberal interpretation and usage of CrPC 482 in quashing matrimonial related criminal complaints in the interest of justice and equity (what else?), ensures that higher judiciary is not the place where husbands can expect to get their interests safeguarded.  It will be only for those who are adamant, the compromisers will be thrown down the compromise chute, and they will emerge at the other end without their savings/property, and without any legal cases on them either, so they are probably ready to try second marriage, or whatever else in life.

The full blame can’t lie on lawyers or higher judiciary either.  Indians in general are masters in cutting deals/taking the shortcut/compromises/zombie-surviving through life.  Most want to find a legal loophole, or technique to gain an upper hand… the number of men filing RCR (and lawyers advising to do the same) on wife is a clear case in point: filed with intention that it’s a counter point to wife’s false allegations, but totally backfiring later because law and courts are not meant to judge based on anyone’s future stated intentions, but based on evidences and truth of past allegations – of both parties.

In Part 2 of the article series, I will cover on realistic, do-able, maybe-unpalatable-to-many techniques which can be used to mitigate or reduce the impact of possible future false cases by wife.  Many of those will need to be done right from the time of choosing a marriage partner itself, and then implemented diligently with some self-discipline after marriage too.  In this article, I will restrict to the legal things.

Basics of how laws were made for protection of married women

Let’s start by some basics first:

  1. India is a democratic country, supposed to be governed under a constitution and by laws made by lawmakers, who are elected by people.
  2. Since the laws are made by lawmakers who are elected by people, and not by some monarch, despot, or dictator; it can safely be said that the people who elect the lawmakers have responsibility too in electing the right lawmakers.
  3. If by chance some bad laws are made for whatever reason, it’s up to the people to recognize that, and then elect a different set of candidates in next election who have already promised to fix those bad laws.  After election, it’s very much possible the same candidates who promised earlier to change laws are now not so keen to fix the bad laws.  It’s up to citizens to keep the pressure on lawmakers at all times.  The process may seem slow, but nothing impossible in it, and it’s not any different in other democratic countries either.
  4. Laws are made to maintain law and order, prevent injustice, safeguard rights, prevent crime etc. in society.  All married women protection laws are also made with the same intent – prevent injustice, safeguard rights, and prevent crimes against married women.
  5. The criminal laws like IPC 498A, IPC 406 are supposed to be used to protect women from cruelty in marriage, usurpation of stridhan etc.
  6. The civil (or quasi-civil-quasi-criminal if you like) laws like DV Act, CrPC 125, maintenance under Hindu Marriage Act, HAMA etc. have been made to protect and safeguard interests of women (and children as stated though it’s debatable how giving sole custody to mothers is always in best interests of children).
  7. There are no sections under Hindu Marriage Act, or under other laws either, which protect or safeguard the rights or interests of a married man.
  8. Except for DV Act, all these married women protection laws were passed by mostly broad support and agreement in society (at least no one protested).  Against DV Act there were some debates and counter-points given, but it was at the level of TV interviews (Karan Thapar vs. WCD minister Renuka Chowdhary), and nothing really on the ground.  So the lawmakers didn’t really have any real incentive to spend precious brain-energy and instead they could ignore these counter-views.
  9. Most of Indian men including married men are somewhat aware that there are no laws to safeguard interests of men, and they are aware that such laws exist to protect women.  Except for MRA community, most men are quite ok with such a situation.  Many men keep commenting on internet on how bad some women are behaving these days, or all laws are being misused by women etc. etc., but the same men will never be seen in an on-the-ground protest against laws, so their comments are basically not of much interest to politicians, who are more concerned about how people vote, and not about how they comment on internet (unless that could reflect in votes).
READ:  How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC 125, 498A etc

So why can’t one safeguard from false cases already filed or to be filed by wife?

Now that we covered the base on how the laws got to be made for protecting married women, we can quickly cover why safeguarding of married man (and his family) from these laws is not possible.

  1. The intent of laws is to be used for protection, and prevent injustice or crime.  Possibility of laws being misused is a point which is recognized by law, and hence there are provisions in IPC and CrPC to punish for misuse of laws, giving false evidence etc.  If these provisions are hardly ever used, that’s a separate problem which needs to be solved.  Many of these provisions were probably right there from beginning in IPC of 1861, so if Indians after getting independence from British have kept the same IPC but didn’t use the provisions to prosecute false cases, then blame lies on us.  Maybe the Indian psyche is to punish the people for crime, but leave punishment for filing false cases to almighty.  Whatever be the reason, judiciary and lawmakers have to learn how to do their job properly.
  2. As mentioned in point 7 in previous section, most men are also aware that there are no laws to protect married men.  Hardly any apart from MRAs are raising voice about it.  So when a man gets married, he should take some responsibility for taking the risk of facing false cases in future from wife.  Everyone above the voting age of 18 has to take some part of responsibility of what laws exist in the country, and what future laws will get passed.
  3. Now many will raise questions like: “But I didn’t commit any crime…”, “I didn’t ask for dowry”, “My wife is lying that I’m impotent”, etc. etc.  Well, the judicial and court procedures will ensure that those who are not guilty don’t get punished (assuming of course they prepare well and have reasonable legal defence), but how can one avoid the trial itself when being accused of something?  If the point is that one should be free from being accused of any crime, then please vote for some party which is willing to bring such laws (AAP could fit some of that criteria being the party on the bleeding-edge-of-politics-and-what-else, but even they are committed to cause of women protection so they can’t do it Open-mouthed smile).  If such laws could ever get passed which would prevent someone from even being falsely accused, then the strong and evil will ensure that no one will be able to accuse them of any crime or wrong-doing.  They will term it as false accusations, and the cases against them will be closed before even getting filed.  Whether accusation is false or true can’t be judged at stage of filing complaint.
  4. That brings to other point about women protection laws.  It’s the men who have been painted as strong and evil, so there is almost zero chance that an allegation against a man can be termed as false right at stage of filing complaint.  The other way is quite likely, because it’s possible for the weak and downtrodden to claim that they are being falsely persecuted.  Any wonder what happens in real life?  — when men go to police to file complaint against wife, they are laughed away!
  5. The broad problem also is that many men suffer from male vanity.  They probably believe that truth is a strong defence, so there is not much need to worry about wife’s abusive behaviour, and once she actually goes to police or tries some such thing, she will face how difficult it is to file false complaint.  Well, what could be further from truth?  There is a whole cottage industry out there who would welcome and encourage such women to file complaint, and there are incentives for lawyers to take up complaints by married women (certainly there are no disincentives) howsoever frivolous and prima-facie false they may seem to be, and convert it into a DV petition and file in court to ask for maintenance and compensation.
READ:  Send email/post to law commission to implement shared parenting law to get better child access/custody/visitation

So to summarize: laws are made so that the people who are victims of crime or whose rights are taken away unjustifiably can file criminal complaint, or civil petition to restore their rights.  Most men are also aware about such women protection laws, and they implicitly agree that women need to be protected, by not raising voice against such unjust laws.  It is not possible by legal means to prevent a criminal complaint from being filed against you, or to prevent a civil petition for maintenance or such reliefs by wife.  So there is no way to protect oneself, the only legal way short of C-word is to fight it out in court based on evidences, and of course reasonably good legal preparation overall during the case.

Also, if husbands could safeguard from criminal or civil complaint from wife, then the ‘evil’ husbands (so why would laws be passed if no one ever does any evil) would have nothing to worry about, and they could care little about any consequence of their actions.  As to the fact why there are no laws to get justice for husbands from wives (except relief by way of filing divorce), the above points cover the basics of how laws have come into being as they are today.  Men are the ones who got these laws passed, and most in fact will continue to sleep till their own head gets hit by the hammer of women protection laws.

Can an affidavit from wife protect from further false cases?

This is favourite thought of those who have already been dragged legally by wife to PS or to court, but still have a hope that she can come back and live happily ever after.  Or wife herself has offered to come back!  In which case the first brilliant idea thought of is to get an affidavit or written paper from wife where she says that she will not file false cases in future.

The problem is that no kind of affidavit can absolve anyone of what may happen in future.  Take an analogy:

  1. Let’s say your neighbour picks up a fight with you and the fault is entirely his.
  2. Instead of you reporting to police he goes to police station first and tries to file false allegations against you
  3. You are called to police station and with some luck you are able to prove that the fault was entirely neighbour’s and the fight was started by him.
  4. Being afraid that he may do a similar false complaint again in future, you want to safeguard yourselves.  Affidavit time!
  5. So as a compromise you get neighbour to write and sign an affidavit that he will not file a (false) case against you in future.
  6. But the future is uncertain.  No one including yourselves can guarantee that the two of you may not have a fight in future, and also it cannot be certain as to the fight would have started due to whose fault.  Such an affidavit or undertaking is against principles of law as well as common sense.  If such an undertaking had legal binding for all future time, then you could in future fight with him or harm him in many ways possible, and he won’t be able to file cases against you.
  7. So such an affidavit signed by neighbour about future actions or non-actions has no legal binding value.
  8. Now this is exactly similar to the kind of affidavit people want from wife.  Applying same logic, an affidavit signed by wife about undertaking not to file any cases (be it about dowry, torture, cruelty) in future has no legal value at all.  Because one may get such an affidavit signed and then use it as a permanent shield to indulge in all kind of wrongdoings in future.
  9. At most, if the wife admits in affidavit that she has made false allegations/filed false cases so far, that part will have a legal value because she would be admitting to having filed false cases.  A caveat is that in Indian system wife is generously allowed to later claim that she had signed that affidavit under force.  You can take a video recording of the whole process, get the affidavit signed by 2 witnesses, but still she may claim that it was done under coercion.  She may be able to file cases again, and your only recourse is to wait till trial/evidence/cross-examination time to use this signed affidavit to bring her past actions and past lies to attention of court.
READ:  Analysis of provisions for punishing false cases/allegations and false evidence in IPC and CrPC

So, use affidavit only for purpose of getting on record that wife has filed false cases/allegations so far.  No (abnormal) wife will do it normally, and a normal one won’t put you in that situation in the first place.  It’s not going to happen.

Getting any kind of undertaking about future actions has zero legal value.

Also read below article on getting newspaper apology from wife (again, it’s not going to happen, but it’s a good way to stop her from coming back again and again to do same drama):

Template/Format for newspaper apology by wife for filing false complaint or cases

Can I safeguard myself by filing counter-cases?

Again this line of inquiry by many shows their lack of knowledge of law/justice, or actually a lack of confidence in law/justice; OR they are pretending to be weak/helpless and trying to find loopholes or legal techniques to make their position stronger; probably believing secretly that the law is an ass to be whipped and controlled by whoever holds the stick, and then trying to find that elusive stick!

One should never ever file any counter-case.  The only cases one needs to file is where one has one’s own grouse, or complaint, or relief sought based on cruelty by wife etc.  So if wife’s brother and father beats you anywhere, then you can file a complaint of assault in PS.  It’s a complaint, NOT counter-complaint.  If someone calls you on phone and threatens you, then you can file a complaint to police.  Again, it’s a complaint, NOT counter-complaint.  A counter-complaint is self-admission of the intention to have filed it only because your wife filed something on you first, thereby making it look like a feeble attempt to get back at opposite party, rather than an attempt to get justice for crime done on you.

Any lawyer’s advise to file counter-complaint should be assessed from perspective of what is there in it for the lawyer.  Most likely you will see that lawyer stands to earn well for little work, for probably zero benefit to you.

RCR is not a safeguard, it’s a trap

Husband filing RCR after any kind of allegation by wife in writing – be it in DV petition, in complaint to PS, an FIR etc.; is a tacit admission on his part that if his wife has done any wrong or cruelty to him; it is either of mild nature or something which can be condoned(forgiven) by husband, and by filing RCR such past behaviour of wife will stand to be legally condoned.  You can scream and shout all you want in whichever court you go to, to mediator, to your own lawyer; but secretly they will all be laughing or waiting for when you will break down psychologically and get ready to sign on the the compromise deed which wife wants.  Again, it shows lack of not just legal knowledge, but throwing away of common sense in favour of idea of ‘hitting back at wife with something’, which is in reality a boomerang which hits only the husband.

So a short summary once again: laws were made to protect weak, most in society agreed married women are weak and need protection via laws, such laws were passed (by mostly male dominated parliament), many women started misusing these laws, now men asking how to safeguard, sorry… pre-emptive safeguard and preventing of legal cases is not possible, you have to go through trial and fight based on evidence.  The only long term solution is to change the laws, make laws gender neutral, punish women who file false cases/perjury (it’s men in general who don’t want it actually), or don’t marry (or go for second marriage) if you want 100% safeguard.

Questions about this Article?

Ask in Telegram Group Men Rights India Q&A  (Also include link to this Article when you post question)

👉Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony

Related Posts

  1. Flaws in marriage amendment (2010) bill aka IrBM Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage
  2. NRI husband gets wife in police lock-up under Sec 66A of Information Technology Act
  3. How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC 125, 498A etc
  4. Is there any law which supports men?

Filed Under: Men Rights Tagged With: Fight Back, Law Making, Laws

Comments

  1. Gyan says

    November 13, 2019 at 12:01 pm

    Thanks Videv for nice article. Per my personal opinion, best safeguard from false cases is to contest them. Its not only husband who are making rounds to courts but these beloved 498a/DV wives also. They think initially that upon filing the false cases, everyone will listen to them including courts. But as you said in many of your informative blogs, such false complain will go through trial. Also, even if a 498a/DV wife alongwith her family apologizing through paper publication. We need to analyze her cause of sudden change of heart. Usually, it happens when they were expecting high maintenance but even after one year, they are getting nothing. Even after paper publication, 498a/DV wife comes back and she injured herself and get MLR. What will be the value of apology through paper publication. Husbands again will have to go to trial and this time, wife will be more cunning as during this period, what we are learning about these laws and processes, she will also be learning and next time, she will prepare better. So, per my personal opinion basic characteristics of a human being never change and there are higher chances of multiple future litigations. So, there is risk and there is no safeguard except to contest based on merits. If a husband is making round of courts for 8-10 years, so is these beloved 498a/DV wives.

    Reply
    • videv says

      November 14, 2019 at 4:46 pm

      >>Even after paper publication, 498a/DV wife comes back

      I don’t know of any instance where a woman has apologized via a newspaper notice. Their lawyers will never let them do it. The only known case is for a woman who was already divorced and published in newspaper an apology much after the divorce, probably to get some extra financial help from ex-husband/in-laws.

      The newspaper apology technique is meant as a counter to the pressure put on husbands to simultaneously face 498A/DV cases, as well as be ready to take back wife at her own sweet will and option!

      Reply
  2. lakshman says

    November 13, 2017 at 12:38 pm

    Affidavit from a wife stating that she would not file any case might not hold good in court.
    But what happens when I get an affidavit from a person with whom I have a live-in relationship to protect myself from harassment claims? An affidavit stating that she is in this relationship out of her own volition and and that she would not claim any form of support from me once the relationship comes to an end?

    Reply
    • videv says

      December 9, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      Such affidavit can be useful (if someone is willing) but it can’t fully protect you if she gets a false medico-legal certificate etc about physical abuse etc and then files a DV case based on that. Working/income proofs are always best to avoid maintenance. Any woman who sits at home can make your life miserable if she pursues maintenance etc in courts. She could (and would) even claim that the affidavit was signed by her under force, and once she says that then all other allegations of emotional/mental abuse are also fair game …. You will be able to catch her lies only at cross-examination and subsequently your evidence stage, one can never be fully protected from false allegations and subsequent court trial.

      Also, if the nature of relationship is more like husband-wife in front of society, then also it can lead to trouble.

      Reply
  3. Syed says

    June 27, 2017 at 1:26 pm

    Hi Good Day, One of my brother’s wife called him to live in separate home within 1.5 months from marriage and he is financially weak and could not offer separate home, meanwhile she was pregnant and she and her family did abortion without husband’s consent and did not inform him…now he is break up and don’t want to live, but she is threatening that “if you didn’t live with me will file a case and ask for compensation money!” how to deal with her? please help

    Reply
    • videv says

      June 27, 2017 at 5:10 pm

      It is his choice whether or not to live with her, but she can also file DV or other cases in court, so he should get ready.

      Get proofs of abortion etc, though as per law wife does not need husband’s consent for abortion. But it can help you in other ways within overall circumstances.

      Reply
      • Syed says

        June 27, 2017 at 9:12 pm

        Thanks Videv sir, He has all call recordings, and she has accepted to Jamath (Counselling team)that they only aborted, and she accepted to her husband on phone calls. But its planned abortion, her said 3 times on 3 situations that we will do abortion. And he has asked permission to one of the Imam in the city. so already they planned to abort finally they did it and did not inform to husband and his family…but husband does not know that where they did abortion and which doctor did it!

        Reply
        • videv says

          June 29, 2017 at 4:21 pm

          So you can use those recordings etc as evidence, in case they allege that husband forced wife to abort.

          Reply
  4. Yashodhar pal says

    July 9, 2016 at 12:59 pm

    My wife had an premarrital affair I was not told about it my inlows well known with that.after marriage wife wanted to live with her ex as wel as her family wants high status in their soocity too..wife k inlows threatng me to file dowry n other serious cases…I’m a public servent ..my life become gel..I have several proofs for my innocence…plz help me out

    Reply
    • videv says

      July 9, 2016 at 4:38 pm

      >>I have several proofs for my innocence…plz help me out

      Public servant… so that means at least you will know more about how police, govt, judiciary etc works; so why not use that knowledge to fight back?

      Reply
  5. Shylesh says

    April 15, 2016 at 3:48 pm

    RCR plays major role getting bail if it is filed before 498A. After cases are filed RCR is useless.RCR is potent tool for saving from false cases it is used right. it even blocks maintenence and alimony from divorce. even it can save from 498A only if it is filed before cases are filed.

    Reply
    • videv says

      April 17, 2016 at 3:48 pm

      Even if one files before any cases, usually wives file multiple cases upon husband filing RCR… because they also know that not filing cases would make their position weaker over time.

      Filing RCR is much more dangerous than even filing divorce by husbands… a 498A is almost assured upon filing RCR.

      Reply
      • Shylesh says

        April 22, 2016 at 3:45 pm

        In my case RCR played major role in getting Anticipatory bail for 498A. here why should file RCR.
        1. it gives an impression to court that you love your wife but she is greedy.
        2. Court doesnt want spoil marraiges since they also know that it is false.
        3. divorce or maintenence cannot proceed further once RCR is filed.
        4. RCR directly proves wife is wrong if she files multiple cases. court will favour u the most.
        5. you should keep your emotions out in the court and think what court wants .
        6. if you get anticipatory bail in any false case it is win all u need to do is finish the formality.
        there are lot things in court procecdures which favour RCR.
        RCR will play major role in getting divorce without any hurt
        all you want to see devil in detials.

        Reply
        • videv says

          April 22, 2016 at 5:53 pm

          Maybe you should count yourselves very very lucky. Just in case other people fall for same points, I am replying to points below:

          >>1. it gives an impression to court that you love your wife but she is greedy.
          >>2. Court doesnt want spoil marraiges since they also know that it is false.

          By law, courts can’t presume anything without evidence. If you do produce some prima-facie good evidence at time of petition, surely court can take a call based on that. It may be useful for some initial relief only.

          >>3. divorce or maintenence cannot proceed further once RCR is filed.

          Hope you are not some lawyer’s rep… Husband filing RCR entitles wife to file for maintenance under Section 24 of HMA.

          >>5. you should keep your emotions out in the court and think what court wants .

          Criminal law is not supposed to be some kind of psychological game play, even if our judiciary is bent to reducing it to that in favour of women.

          >>6. if you get anticipatory bail in any false case it is win all u need to do is finish the formality.

          Of course, if you mean IPC 498A/406 trial for 5-7 years is just finishing a formality.

          >>RCR will play major role in getting divorce without any hurt all you want to see devil in detials.

          Do let us know when you get your divorce based on filing RCR… Devil is of course in the details.

          Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Is there any law which supports men? - Men Rights India says:
    September 17, 2016 at 12:42 pm

    […] have already covered in this article in detail why there are no 100% safeguards from false cases, and the only safeguard from false cases will be to prosecute and punish those filing false […]

    Reply
  2. Template/Format for newspaper apology by wife for filing false complaint or cases - Men Rights India says:
    August 6, 2016 at 8:52 pm

    […] wife to give in writing that she will not file any false cases in future.  What a joke?  Read this post to understand in detail why it is not legally possible to stop wife from filing cases…, no matter whether she signs an affidavit on stamp paper in presence of whole panchayat/samaj/jamat […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines:

👉Kannada/ Hindi/ English: Call Sharath +919738010456
👉Free guidance (10-15 min)
👉Paid Guidance (For 30 min or more), click to pay

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India


Take Quizzes to test your legal knowledge!

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


👉(Read Online eBook)👈
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Contribute via UPI: videv@upi / videv@icici / videv@paytm

Today’s Popular Posts

  • How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC…
  • How to file objections/written statement to…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell,…
  • Section 41, 41A, 41B of CrPC which govern arrest by…
  • How to draft a child custody (GWC) petition
  • How to complain against judges of trial courts, High…
  • Delhi HC Judgment – Secretly taken Audio…
  • Contact
  • How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125…
  • Shared household under DV Act clarified in 2006 SC judgment

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

Jaipur court allows prosecution for false document

17 Feb 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Indian women can have 2 husbands – 1 to slave on, 1 to pay maintenance

12 Oct 2009 By videv 1 Comment

Delhi High court invokes constitution to protect woman

23 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Only feminists can see permanent halo around women

16 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Delhi court says give proof of income before registering dowry case

9 Mar 2010 By videv 2 Comments

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • Rajesh on Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance, divorce etc.
  • DHAVAL JOAHI on Visitation rights – 1
  • videv on Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell, counselling/mediation etc
  • videv on Complaint against male abuse in Asian Paints Damp Proof advertisement -advertiser advised by ASCI to modify or remove it
  • Gurpreet Singh on Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell, counselling/mediation etc

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts