Men Rights India

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » 498a News » NBW (arrest warrant) issued against woman for false dowry harassment case

NBW (arrest warrant) issued against woman for false dowry harassment case

24 Sep 2014 By videv 6 Comments

In probably a first case in India, a woman who made a false dowry harassment complaint has been issued NBW (non-bailable warrant) by JMFC, Mangalore for filing a false case under IPC 498a.  The news doesn’t mention 498a but dowry harassment case is just another name for IPC 498a case.

👉(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act 👈

👉(Read Online eBook): Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law👈

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mangalore/False-dowry-compliant-court-issues-arrest-warrant-for-woman-doctor/articleshow/43094829.cms

The police summoned Dr Rao and his parents and held a detailed enquiry by questioning the relatives and neighbours. It was revealed that there was no dowry at all in the marriage and all the marriage expenses were borne by the husband. Allegations of cruelty, beating etc were found to be false. Police concluded that it was a false complaint and hence closed the case.

Dr. N.R.Rao, senior physician of Manipal and his family was deeply hurt on account of this false complaint and approached the JMFC Court praying the court to take action against his daughter in law and her parents for filing false complaint of dowry and harassment. After enquiry, JMFC Court found that there are prima facie materials showing that Dr Ranjeetha and her parents lodged a false complaint of dowry, harassment etc to the police and abused the anti-dowry laws and thereby committed perjury and defamation. The JMFC Court upheld the arguments of complainant’s advocate and ordered to register criminal case (as per C.C.No.1214/14) against the trio. The charges carry maximum of two years prison sentence.

The prosecution against the woman has been started which is a first.  So due credit goes to the judge who has done something different from other judges who may have handled lakhs of such cases before this case BUT those judges never thought of applying applicable section of law against false accusers.

Over 1 lakh 498a cases are filed in India every year.  About 93% result in acquittal.  Why don’t we see more prosecutions of false accusers as in this case?  What happened in this case that was so different?  Actually, many things:

  1. The police INVESTIGATED the case on its merits and found allegations to have no basis.  Police then filed a B-report to the court.
  2. Not only the police said case has no merit, they actually mentioned the case to be false.  That requires some honesty and courage from our supposedly male dominated police whose specialty lies in proceeding to arrest husband and his relatives including the family dog when an IPC 498a complaint is filed.  Due to recent 2 Jul 2014 SC judgment on strict injunction on police to follow CrPC 41 and 41a, these arrests might reduce.
  3. The falsely accused family, specifically father in law decided to file a private complaint to the magistrate.  Usually the husband’s family have no desire to pursue any action against the their ‘bahu’ or daughter in law.  Usual strategy is how to get rid of the whole problem and find another suitable bride for the son; which usually results in similar problem in second marriage too.  But that’s material for another post…

Kudos to Dr Rao for taking stand against criminal bahu.  Hoping for maximum 2 year punishment for her, after all, don’t we want equality to be applied in law to both men and women?  If feminism demands equality, they should welcome punishment to false accuser women rather than demanding to be treated innocent and like children when caught in their own web of lies.  But it probably never was about equality, it started from self-loathing of few women about women’s role in family and society, and then their goal to make women more like men; and over time it morphed into man-hating and irresponsibility.

READ:  Supreme court says let adamant husbands be raped by 498a, but spare old parents

Links to Free eBooks

1. Download my free PDF eBook Surviving the Legal Jungle

2. Read this FREE eBook written by fathers involved in child custody issues (Read Online) (PDF book)

3. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Read Online)

Links to Paid eBooks/Books


1. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

2. Self-study Book on Divorce for Men (Digital eBook Only)

3. Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

Related Posts

  1. Supreme court says let adamant husbands be raped by 498a, but spare old parents
  2. FIR against wife for alleged bid to extort money from husband by threat of false dowry 498A case

Filed Under: 498a News Tagged With: Dowry Harassment, False Case

Comments

  1. AMAN KONARK MODI says

    July 4, 2016 at 2:47 pm

    Dear Respected Madam/Sir,

    With Reference to subject concern, Honorable Madam/Sir, I have try lot on BOMBAY HIGH COURT WEBSITE to search the judgment copy of Bombay High Court related to “Mr. Nilesh Ojha (Human Rights Security Council) case for a scientist man of BARC (Shri Subhash) victim of false 498a from Mumbai & proved beyond reasonable doubt to the court that the false 498a was made by wife to defame her scientist husband’s reputation due to which within ongoing 498a the HC of Mumbai allowed his defamation (IPC 499) petition against the wife. Judgment came on 29th January’2015”

    Hence, it is humble requested to please provide the judgment copy of the Bombay high court on the my email address vande.matram27011987@gmail.com or make update on Bombay High Court Judgment Website for convenience of Public & Citizen of India please.

    Looking forward for you kind cooperation, help & guidance please at the earliest and revert me please.

    In hope.

    Reply
    • videv says

      July 5, 2016 at 4:22 pm

      Humble suggestion: if you can’t find that judgment, possibly it’s not there on site, OR no one else will be able to find it too.

      For general judgment search: check bharatlaw.in (currently Karnataka HC judgments only)

      Reply
  2. Anu gupta says

    November 29, 2015 at 3:28 pm

    Hello sir,

    This is very good that people have stasted their efforts to fight against wrong women who are mis using law…my single son murederd and torchured by her wife with the help of her judge brother at darbhanga bihar she mentally and physically tourchured my son at age of 28.

    after this she ran away to bihar by taking all jewellery and cash for which she and her brother was keep on harrassing us.

    because of misuse of law such kind of women are shame for country ..

    Reply
  3. Adv Aparna Adhalkar says

    October 10, 2014 at 11:34 pm

    Dear Sir/ Madam,

    I m Jr.Adv and m handling dv , 498 a and 125 cr.p.c. for my brother’s side who is opponent. My bhabhi is getting maintenance per month for her and for 4 years old baby in d.v. but yet she has filed 125 cr.p.c. only to harass and to get more maintenance. Can I file Discharge application on the ground that she is already getting maintenance in dv ? If yes pls massage me Important Judgments and format.

    Thank You.

    Reply
    • videv says

      October 12, 2014 at 9:21 pm

      Dear Aparna,

      Being a non-advocate, I wouldn’t like to advise advocates on how to draft a complaint or about it’s format. If there is something already available on website, it is on best effort basis and goodwill and I don’t want to get into giving some ready-made solutions or formulas. They don’t work in real life.

      My simple understanding is that such a maintenance application should not be allowed on grounds of res judicata (same matter already decided in another court/judgment), and that similar/same litigation cannot be started on same cause of action between same parties.

      DV Act also follows CrPC 125 procedure. So effectively a fresh maintenance petition under CrPC 125 is exactly same as DV Act maintenance petition earlier because both are under same section. We have seen multiple maintenance under HMA 25 and CrPC 125 which can be excused a bit only on grounds of using different sections of law, but even that can happen only if judge takes into account maintenance already awarded and deeming it to be insufficient to allow some additional new maintenance on the fresh application filed under a different section of law.

      I have blogged 2 judgments of Mumbai and Delhi HC on similar matters. The Delhi HC judgment is very similar to your case except in that case CrPC 125 was filed first and DV later.

      http://menrightsindia.net/2014/10/mumbai-hc-disallows-multiple-maintenance-under-crpc-125-when-civil-suit-pending.html

      http://menrightsindia.net/2014/10/multiple-maintenance-under-dv-act-denied-when-crpc-125-already-decided.html

      Reply
      • Aparna says

        June 23, 2015 at 6:26 pm

        Thanks a lot sir..also sorry for giving reply so late..actually in 125 the stage of the matter as per the roznama of the court is for evidence of the applicant. But the Advocate of the Applicant asking for argument for interim maintenance yet she is already getting maintenance in dv case..So my question is that can I file Discharge application at this stage but some sr. Advocats are suggesting that u can not file discharge application as u have already filed your say..Sir my another question is : Can I file an application for dismissal as she has not filed evidence from 5-6 dates..sir please assist me asap as the matter is on next week..Thanks a lot!

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines (for quick guidance only):
(Be respectful to volunteers, & we don't advise on divorce)

1. Kannada/Hindi/English: +919738010456
2. Tamil/English: +919962514226

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups for FREE guidance/discussion

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


👉(Read Online eBook)👈
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Today’s Popular Posts

  • How to file objections/written statement to…
  • Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance,…
  • Section 41, 41A, 41B of CrPC which govern arrest by…
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125…
  • How to complain against judges of trial courts, High…
  • How to draft a child custody (GWC) petition
  • How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC…
  • Basic Cross-examination techniques in matrimonial…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

Video: Prenuptial agreements in India – Who benefits?

28 Nov 2015 By videv Leave a Comment

All are respondents under PWDVA, enjoy!

21 Feb 2011 By videv Leave a Comment

Applicability of section 340 of CrPC, and 194 of IPC etc

16 Mar 2010 By videv 1 Comment

Wife to pay 2 lakh damages for alleging husband was impotent

1 Aug 2010 By videv 2 Comments

Delhi Additional Sessions Judge convicts DCP, ACP of Delhi for contempt of court

30 Apr 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • videv on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • Raghu on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • videv on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • P2 on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Child visitation monitor New Haven on Strategy for Child Custody for Men

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts