Men Rights India

Fight against Legal Terrorism

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » Fix the System » How to complain against judges of trial courts, High Courts, and Supreme Court?

How to complain against judges of trial courts, High Courts, and Supreme Court?

4 May 2017 By videv 51 Comments

This post is about how to complain against any judge be it trial courts, high courts, or supreme court in India.  Right now it is being written with information collected from various places and based on personal experiences of people, and over time will have authoritative information.  This post however does not cover about bad or unbecoming conduct of a judge outside of a court or trial scenario.

👉(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act 👈
Contents hide
1 Possible bad or irresponsible conduct of judge
2 Complain via affidavit, and be prepared to hold your ground after complaint
3 Where and to whom to send the complaint

Complain against judge cannot solely be because of a ‘bad’ judgment or order which has gone against you.  Remember that in every interim order/final judgment one of the two opposing parties may not like the order.  But that by itself doesn’t become of a case of complaint against judge, because judge may have followed the law and appreciated the evidence and no bias or misconduct may be proven going by court records.  If you have suffered from a bad or unjustified order, for those there is provision of revision, review, or appeal to higher judiciary.

So in what situations can people complain against judges?

Here we can take guidance from similar procedures from other countries’ processes about complaints against judiciary.  E.g. following webpage from UK shows very clear and detailed procedure and on what kind of matters one can complain against a judge’s conduct there.

http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/making-a-complaint/what-do-we-need-from-you/

Possible bad or irresponsible conduct of judge

  1. I felt that the judge was rude towards me because? (provide details of exactly what the judge said or did / the language used / actions or behaviour)
  2. I felt that the judge was hostile towards me throughout the hearing. This was demonstrated by? (provide details of body language / actions or attitude / comments or behaviour)
  3. It appeared as if the judge had fallen asleep during the hearing (provide details of supporting evidence such as eyes closed / snoring / did not respond to questions)

Note: Though not hostile, I have experienced judges’ casual or insensitive attitude in making irrelevant or insensitive statements/comments which doesn’t go by norms of what judge is supposed to do in line of judicial duty.  And about point about sleeping, I have seen a judge or two making great effort not to nap while OP advocate was giving verbal arguments (one of the instances, the advocate made helpful suggestion to the judge to “take a break” if needed.  That’s ok too if an advocate is up to it and ensures about his/her self-respect).  So these are not entirely hypothetical situations.

One interesting point is that although appeals/reviews/revisions lie against orders/judgments based purely based on written records of the court, a complaint against judge may be possible due to verbal actions of the judge too inside the court hall which are way out of line with judicial propriety or standards.

Another type of example of irresponsible or non-judicial conduct of judge: It was reported by a husband that judge in a DV Act maintenance case threatened in open court to husband to take back wife or the high interim maintenance order will be given by judge!  Such blackmail type threats are clear overstepping of judicial role.

READ:  Invoke IPC 209 on those making false complaints - Delhi HC judgment by Justice J R Midha

The information on above page is quite reasonable, so one can adopt a similar broad format to send complaint and mention as much detail as possible.  Here we might add that though India has inherited many laws and procedural laws from British, you won’t be able to find such clear and detailed information on any official website (later we cover India’s DoJ procedure too) within India.  Simple reason is the mai-baap mind-set in India: we don’t want to complain against mai-baap, because they are the ones who decide our judgment, fate, salary, promotion, reward, punishment, whatever.

Also, from a veteran of many court proceedings, along with complaint sworn affidavit is mandatory. 

From another UK government website:

https://www.gov.uk/complain-judge-magistrate-tribunal-coroner

You can complain if you’re unhappy with a judge, magistrate, tribunal member or coroner’s:

  • behaviour
  • language
  • conduct

You must make your complaint within 3 months.

Just to round up with more information in case readers want to see how it’s happening in UK:

https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/judicial-conduct-and-complaints.html

Complain via affidavit, and be prepared to hold your ground after complaint

Some high courts (e.g. High Court of Karnataka) have made it mandatory to make complaint about judge on an affidavit, presumably because of false or frivolous complaints being made.  The reason for this is that these are serious matters and time of judicial authorities should not be wasted in frivolous complaints.  Making complaint via affidavit means that one is open to possibility of contempt of court if the complaint is found to be false.  So don’t use such complaints just for holding a grudge.  It should be done with mindset of making of a clean judicial and legal system, rather than taking out of anger on an individual.

Where and to whom to send the complaint

Our veteran of many courts has been sending complaints as per jurisdiction below:

1. Subordinate judiciary: Send to Registrar (vigilance), District administrative judge (available from ecourts for my state)

2. HC judges: CJ of HC

3. SC judges: CJI of SC

4. CJ HC: sent to CJI himself(!)

Now for official information: The citizen’s charter PDF file available on below Department of Justice webpage gives several contact information for grievances.  One could contact them over phone/email to find out directly how and where to file complain for a particular jurisdiction/court.

http://doj.gov.in/citizen-charter

Following from their citizen’s charter document:

VISION:
Facilitating administration of Justice that ensures easy access and timely delivery of Justice to all.

MISSION:
Ensuring adequacy of courts and judges, including servicing of appointment of Judges to the higher judiciary, modernization of courts and procedures, policies for judicial reforms and Legal aid to the poor for improved justice delivery.

From the DoJ Guidelines (PDF file), the relevant information about grievances against judiciary has been extracted and given below:

    1. Department of Justice (DOJ) receives large number of grievances from citizens through online CPGRAMS portal and on e.mail of the officers. DoJ also receives grievances through Presidents Secretariat/Vice Presidents Secretariat/PMO/Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances/other Ministries/Departments & also directly. While majority of the grievances are related to judiciary, grievances relating to other Ministries/Departments in the Central Government and pertaining to State Governments/Union Territories are also sent to us. The grievances related to judiciary are handled in the Department of Justice and the grievances pertaining to other Departments/Ministries/State Governments/UTs are forwarded to the offices concerned. The following guidelines relating to disposal of grievances in the Department of Justice are communicated for information/guidance/benefit of grievance holders:
    2. Grievances  related  to  judiciary  are  forwarded  to  the  Secretary General  Supreme  Court  of  India/Registrar  General  of  the concerned High Court for further action, as appropriate.
    3. Any Grievance related to verdicts of the Courts are not handled as a  grievance.    Such  grievance  holders  are  advised  to  seek appropriate legal remedy in the appropriate Court of Law as per rules.  Grievances related to the verdicts of the Courts will be filed in the Department of Justice. Grievances relating to procedure of the Court or matters purely judicial in nature, can be resolved through  Court  of  Law  only.  Such  grievances  will  be  filed  in Department of Justice.
    4. Grievances relating to Judges of Supreme Court are forwarded to the Chief Justice of India and grievances related to Judges of the High Courts are forwarded to Chief Justice of the concerned High Courts for appropriate action.  (As the Judiciary is independent, Government  does  not  ask  for  action  taken  report  nor  sends reminders  to  them.  Grievance  holders  are  advised  to  seek information from the concerned Courts directly in this regard).
    5. Disposal of pending case (s) in court (s) is within the domain of Judiciary, which is an independent organ of the State under the Constitution of India. Government of India does not interfere in the functioning of the Judiciary / proceedings in courts as pendency of a Court Case is subjudice matter which is under consideration of the court.
    6. In case of any grievance relating to undue delay in judgement or unfair judgement or miscarriage of justice, the petitioner is advised to  resort  to  judicial  remedy  by  filing  appeal  or  any  other proceedings  before  the  appropriate  Court  of  Law  within  the prescribed time limit.
    7. As per the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court of India related to grievances/complaints against members of the Subordinate Judiciary, it is clarified that such grievances are to be accompanied with a duly sworn affidavit and verifiable material to substantiate the allegations made therein. Such grievances, alongwith sworn affidavit, need to be sent directly to the Registrar General of the concerned High Court.
READ:  Police can only call people via written notice for investigation: Madras High court guidelines on CrPC 160

The  grievance  holders  are  advised  to  send  the  grievances pertaining to the Supreme Court/High Courts directly to them on the below  mentioned mails in order to expedite disposal of their grievances:

S.No.  Name of the High Court  e.mail ID
1.        Supreme Court of India  supremecourt@nic.in
2.        High Court of Allahabad            rg@allahabadhighcourt.in

3.        High Court of Tripura              thc.vigilance@gmail.com
4.        High Court of Gauhati              regv.ghc@gmail.com
5.        High Court of Kerala               rsjhc.ker@nic.in
6.        High          Court            of   admn.misc.jhcranchi@gmail.com
Jharkhand                          vigilancecellscs.jhcranchi@gmail.com
7.        High          Court            of   rg.ukhc@indiancourts.nic.in
Uttrakhand

8.        High          Court            of   rg.mglhc@indiancourts.nic.in
Meghalaya
9.        High Court of Delhi                aojestablishment2.dhc@nic.in

10.       Bombay High Court                  rgsid-bhc@nic.in

11.       Sikkim High Court                  cpc-sik@nic.in
12.       Punjab & Haryana High              reg.vig-phc@indianjudiciary.gov.in
Court

13.       HP High Court                      arvindm@aij.gov.in
14.       High          Court            of  vv-hc.cg@gov.in
Chhattisgarh
15.       Andhra  Pradesh  High              svsrmoorty@gmail.com
Court

16.       Gujarat High Court                 rg-hc-guj@nic.in
17.       Rajasthan High Court               regadmn-rhc-rj@gov.in
rajinder.tuteja@aij.gov.in
18.       Jammu          &     Kashmir       myakhoon@gmail.com
High Court
19.       Karnataka High Court               grievance@hck.gov.in
20.       Patna High Court                   phcgrievance-bih@gov.in
21.       Madhya  Pradesh  High              usdey15@gmail.com
Court                              rggrievance@yahoo.com
22.       Madras High Court                  regrvigil.tn@nic.in
23.       Manipur High Court                 nd.grievance-hcm@gov.in

24.       Orissa High Court                  rg.orihc@indiancourts.nic.in
25.       Calcutta High Court                cpc-cal@indianjudiciary.gov.in
26.       NALSA                              nalsa-dla@nic.in

  1. Grievances forwarded by Department of Justice are considered and examined by the Judiciary as per their own in house mechanism and the system/procedure to deal with grievances which is normally not shared. In such cases, Department of Justice is not in a position to inform the outcome to grievance holders.
  2. Grievance holders are advised/requested to lodge their grievances on the Public Grievance Portal cpgrams-darpg@nic.in ” only. Since the Government has launched designated portal to receive grievances online, grievances received in the Department of Justice on the email I.Ds of officers will not be entertained.

 

So complaints can be sent either directly to HC if applicable, or to cpgrams-darpg@nic.in.  Don’t send complaints to individual officers’ email ids.

Following are more links to further information and guidelines:

http://ecourts.gov.in/Ecourtktm16-0

http://ecourts.gov.in/kozhikode/complaints-grievances

http://hareshraichura.blogspot.in/2012/09/how-to-file-complaint-against-sitting.html

Questions about this Article?

Ask in Telegram Group Men Rights India Q&A  (Also include link to this Article when you post question)

👉Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony

Related Posts

No related posts.

Filed Under: Fix the System Tagged With: Judiciary

Comments

  1. Kartiken says

    December 14, 2020 at 3:03 pm

    I wanted to file perjury application in family court against a fake witness produced by wife in divorce case which went against me . Can I file an application of perjury in the same Court before the same judge as I have proof that the witness was not present during the alleged incident.

    Reply
    • videv says

      December 17, 2020 at 11:49 am

      Yes file perjury IA in same court against that witness. The judge will do a preliminary enquiry and if your evidence found credible, will forward it to magistrate court for a fresh case registration and criminal trial for perjury.

      Reply
  2. Naveen says

    June 7, 2020 at 9:13 pm

    HI

    High court judge has not considered evidence which is against the accused and quashed the case whom should i reach to make a complaint in telangana high court please advise

    thanks iin advance

    Reply
    • videv says

      June 18, 2020 at 8:57 pm

      Quashing is usually not done based on evidence. In any case, it’s not a cause for complaint but you could appeal to SC if you want to.

      Reply
  3. KATTA SATYANARAYNA says

    August 29, 2019 at 8:32 pm

    Respected sir,
    1). We are citizen’s of Razole town in East Godavari District. We are all suffering with Judicial Officer Mr. Karan Kumar Senior Civil Judge, Razole. He is misuse his Judicial power in various department employees and common people. He used to blow high frequency horn and afraid of people in Razole village surroundings.
    2). ONe KATTA SATYANARAYANA, he is one of the season fruit business labour. He is running his business near Busstand at razole village. He bring the fruits via Kadiyam remote village of Pottilanka to Razole in A.P.S.R.T.C RAZOLE DEPOT BUSES frequently. Six months back Senior Civil Judge accountant came to razole court in Rajamahendravaram to Razole RTc bus, near pottilanka said KATTA SATYANARAYANA lifted his fruits in the bus, but the same time said account argued the satyanarayana not to bring the fruits in bus. Some dispute arise in Pottilanka village not in Razole Court jurisdiction. But the disputed taken in SuMoto to razole Senior Civil Judge, to directed the Razole police take custody to said Katta Satyanarayana. The Razole police take custody and presence of Senior Civil Judge, the judge angry with satyanarayana, you are a common man why you are argue to my judicial department employee, and punished 100 Gudilu and touched the foot of said Court employee in open court in front of all advocates. In this situation all the advocates are stun and silence that incidence. This is not only one but also so many complainants to Senior Civil Judge. He entered so many private in PLC filed cases in Razole Senior Civil Judge court, he directed some contra issues against revenue and police departments. All the happening aspects to discuss in Hon’ble District Judge at RAzole Bar association Chamber, the Hon’ble District Court Judge here all the complainants against Senior Civil Judge but he did not take any inquiry about the issues arise in Razole. So i request your kind authorities to conduct inquiry in Razole village or Razole court to give the justice . Thank you

    Reply
  4. Shanmugam says

    July 26, 2019 at 10:39 am

    Sir the trail court reopen the suit case issues framed without plaintiff present,and no notice issued copy of memo also not served memo filed by defendant
    This action not following law i can made complaint against the trail court before the high court registry

    Reply
    • videv says

      July 26, 2019 at 1:15 pm

      Difficult to say

      Reply
  5. Anil Kumar says

    June 8, 2019 at 5:27 pm

    In a case of sale of property the R sold his ancestral house in 1993 after death of his father in 1988. He denied the sale but it was decreed in 2001 he filed first appeal dismissed in 2008. He filed RSA through advocate SUDH M dismissed in 2010 and SLP DISMISSED. In 2008 sons A&A of his sisters ( died in 1997 and 2000 ) filed civil suit in district Court that their Mama has sold ancestral house and our mothers were having share and we are demanding through ADVOCATE SOHA M father of SUDH M . It was begining of collusion. Seller did not appear and A&A did not become party in RSA.
    Purchaser gave replies filed execution in 2010 A&A filed objections . Sellar also filed objection in 2011 that he has sold share of his sisters. In 2012 A&A withdrawn civil suit “dismissed as withdrawn” . In 2013 court dismissed all objections stating that these are family members and sisters or A&A did not become parties in case went uptown Apex Court. The decree can not be reversed. Sale deed was registered with warrant of possession. A&A made appeal.

    Now in 2013 legal heirs of sellar filed civil suit that they have right in it as their father in collussion has sold the property which is ancestral coparcenary.

    Appeal of A&A was remanded back to hear in accordance with law . Legal heirs also filed objections. All objections were dismissed. Only A&A made appeal was dismissed in 2014 made second appeal and stayed the proceedings.

    Civil suit of legal heirs of sellar was dismissed in 2017 and appeal dismissed in 2018 as the property ancestral coparcenary not proved.

    A complaint to Registrar vigilance High Court , CJI and PM office was made. Stating that the out come of the case will be published in media / social media. After that High Court reversed decisions. Supreme Court also said delay condoned in review petition but there was no delay. This all has to be published for awareness. This is example of misuse of process of law. Collussion of advocates.Please guide. Details as under

    In 2018 High Court allowed the appeal of A&A without formulating question of law, civil suit was dismissed as withdrawn, decree was final upto Apex Court. Concurrent findings of collussions were set aside, nature of property was not confirmed , also said that legal heirs have independant right.

    Purchaser made SLP was dismissed and made review petition in time but in decision it was written that delay condoned. Which proves that it was dismissed without reading. Supreme court did not follow own warnings to High courts that it is mandatory to formulate substantial question of law in second appeal. This was second appeal in execution.

    After this legal heirs of sellar filed RSA through advocate SUDH M Purchaser has restarted the execution. High court had ordered for one third share and civil action on sellar for his statement that he was owner of house and sold it. Now the advocate of sellar is SOHA M . The nature of property is known to these advocates, they are setting an example of misuse of process of law breaking also limitation act . Contact please for further proceedings. Main purpose behind this is your experience is accurate.

    Reply
    • videv says

      June 14, 2019 at 8:52 am

      Cursory reading shows you know lot more than I can fathom going through minute details. If the case has gone to HC and SC too, then if any judicial decision is bad, it can be challenged in appropriate forum.

      Limitation act is there to set time to file appeals etc, but condonation of delay is often allowed if it furthers justice or if an injustice or illegality has been done in a proceeding. If the merits of case are good, even a wrong decision on condonation of delay shouldn’t affect the final judgment.

      If an advocate is doing professional misconduct, then there is a separate remedy also available by filing complaint to state’s bar council against that advocate under Sec 35 of Advocates’ Act. I plan to write on that soon. But the complaint to bar council can’t really set right the wrong judgments, for which one has to pursue in courts only.

      Reply
  6. Vipul says

    May 20, 2019 at 2:02 pm

    Hey,

    1. Two applications filed by me in DV case (1. allow my parents to pick my kids from school, 2.) application under CRPC 91 to produce CDRs of OP.
    2. Another application by OP for interim maintenacne.
    3. Judge heard the arguments on Interim in Aug 2018 and didn’t order till date and never took it in record that arguments on interim are done
    4. On every date of hearing she mention in orders that arguments on CRPC 91 is pending and both the parties seeked adjournment
    5. before all this an old judge in the same case has directed applicant 3 times to adduce evidences
    6. After waiting for 9 monhts and requesting verbally multiple times we moved the application in written to give final chance to OP to adduce evidence and deicde on my applications
    7. So now rather than deciding my application on CRPPC 91 or giving the final warning to OP she ordered interim. I know if I am not satisfied with order I need to appeal against it but I want to understand from you if above points/conduct gives me a reason to complain against judge for breaching the process of law.

    Reply
    • videv says

      May 20, 2019 at 8:32 pm

      First a general observation: Cases can sometimes move in haphazard way, where case may be posted for one thing on a date but depending on an advocate’s submission another matter may get heard. Usually only one important issue may get heard on one day given many cases in a day and paucity of time. It is duty of your advocate to keep track and be alert and press for your IA.

      Perusing the order sheets carefully is necessary. I think what may have happened is that the interim maintenance application was NOT DISMISSED, it was only kept pending for a long time. So legally speaking, that application is still alive even though in the meantime the case status has moved to evidence stage. Usually, some judges reject interim maintenance if they don’t find merit it, and ask for evidence/trial to begin to decide the final maintenance at end of trial.

      When multiple IAs are pending (by whichever side), whatever is considered higher priority OR whatever gets pushed more by a party’s lawyer may tend to be heard first, and disposed earlier. Interim maintenance can be decided without looking at evidence, so if the case had moved to evidence stage, then the interim maintenance IA should have been dismissed before that. There is possibility that your advocate was not diligent (or was aware but let it slide anyway because husband ought to lose!). The other possibility is that there is manipulation with order sheets, but one should not jump to that conclusion and start filing complaints.

      The problem with interim maintenance is that if it is kept pending for long time, one fine day judge may pass an order on it. Many a time husband’s lawyer will give the impression that everything is fine even though he/she will be aware of this fact! They misled you into believing that CrPC 91 and CDR will be taken up first before interim maintenance order.

      Also, DV judges may not take child related application seriously or on priority basis.

      Reply
  7. Kabaleeswaran says

    April 30, 2019 at 6:59 am

    I have filed a court case against the builder with Consumer Court which is still ongoing. Meanwhile, the builder has filed a petition in Madras High Court citing the Arbitration Class prevailing in the construction agreement for which we have already given the counter as well. The final arguments was over on 25th February 2019 and till date we have not received the judgment.

    I sent email to regrvigil.tn@nic.in in this regard but so far no reply.

    Kindly help me how to get the judgement for this petition.

    Reply
    • videv says

      May 10, 2019 at 2:52 pm

      I don’t see how delay in pronouncing order is directly linked to some kind of misconduct or corruption. Vigilance dept will usually act (within the judicial system) if some good evidence of misconduct or corruption is made available. One should not send emails in a casual way. You can check with your advocate on how much is reasonable time to pronounce a judgment (practically speaking rather than by statute), and what are judicial remedies which an advocate can invoke if it is not being pronounced after much delay.

      I know of several cases in various (below HC) courts where judgments don’t get pronounced for several months at end. At HC level, usually proceedings won’t be delayed unless both parties are not pursuing, or one party is unreachable via notice. But once arguments are over, orders have to be pronounced since nothing further is pending from parties in terms of need for adjudication.

      Reply
      • Easwaran says

        June 29, 2020 at 6:11 pm

        Sub: My final decree petition has been pending since 2014. (I.A.
        No.234 of 2017 (re-number of I.A. No.572 of 2014 in O.S. No. 216 of 2013
        The sub-Court Uthamapalayam).
        1. CRP (MD)-1359/2018 dated 4.07.2018,
        2. C.R.P.[MD]No. 183 of 2019 dated 14.02.2019
        3. C.R.P.[MD]No. 1801 of 2019 dated 21.10.2019
        4. C.R.P.[MD]No. 2308 of 2019 dated 08.01.2020
        5. List of the disposed of the case in the year 2018-19

        1. I am a senior citizen aged about 69 years and My final decree petition has
        been pending since 2014.

        2.I submit that by Order of High Court, CRP (MD)-1359/2018 dated
        4.07.2018, the Trial Court was directed to conduct the trial on a day-today
        basis within the time fixed four (4) weeks. But, the learned
        Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam did not dispose of the said
        Interlocutory application in I.A. No.234 of 2017 (re-number of I.A. No.572
        of 2014) in O.S. No. 216 of 2013.

        3.I submit that by the Second time by Order of High Court,
        C.R.P.[MD]No. 183 of 2019 dated 14.02.2019, the Trial Court was directed
        to dispose of the I.A. No.234 of 2017 (renumber of I.A. No.572 of 2014) in
        O.S. No. 216 of 2013, on giving priority, within three (3) weeks. But, the
        learned Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam did not dispose of the said
        Interlocutory application in I.A. No.234 of 2017 (re-number of I.A. No.572
        of 2014 in O.S. No. 216 of 2013.

        4. I submit that by Third time by Order of High Court,
        C.R.P.[MD]No. 1801 of 2019 dated 21.10.2019, the Trial Court was
        directed to dispose of the I.A. No.234 of 2017 (renumber of I.A. No.572 of
        2014) in O.S. No. 216 of 2013, directed the learned Subordinate Judge,
        Uthamapalayam, Theni District to hear the matter on day to day basis and
        dispose of the I.A.No.234 of 2017 in O.S.No.216 of 2013, on merits and by
        law, within 30 days. But, the learned Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam
        did not conduct the matter on day to day basis and did not dispose of the
        said Interlocutory application in I.A. No.234 of 2017 (re-number of I.A.
        No.572 of 2014 in O.S. No. 216 of 2013.

        5. I submit that by Fourth time by Order of High Court,
        C.R.P.[MD]No. 2308 of 2019 dated 08.01.2020, the Trial Court was
        directed to dispose of the I.A. No.234 of 2017 (renumber of I.A. No.572 of
        2014) in O.S. No. 216 of 2013, directed the learned Subordinate Judge,
        Uthamapalayam, Theni District to dispose of the I.A.No.234 of 2017 in
        O.S.No.216 of 2013, on merits and by law, within 4 months. But, the
        learned Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam did not dispose of the said
        Interlocutory application in I.A. No.234 of 2017 (re-number of I.A. No.572
        of 2014 in O.S. No. 216 of 2013.

        The Sub Judge wontedly the delaying to Implement the Hon’ble High
        Court order dated 04.07.2018, 14.02.2019, 21.10.2019, and 08.01.2020
        in I.A No. 234 of 2017 in O.S No. 216 of 2013 on the file of The Sub Court
        Uthamapalayam.

        6. The Superior Court had passed four orders, directing Sub Court
        Uthamapalayam to dispose of the final decree petition but The Sub Judge
        Uthamapalayam not even consider this Hon’ble High Court order dated
        04.07.2018, 14.02.2019, 21.10.2019 and 08.01.2020 in I.A No. 234 of
        2017 in O.S No. 216 of 2013. These High court orders are not in force.

        7. The Sub Judge uthamapalayam never followed or obeyed the
        Honorable high court order issued in I.A-234/2017 in O.S-216/2013.

        Kindly suggest how to handle the matter.

        Contempt of court is applicable?

        Reply
        • videv says

          July 2, 2020 at 9:22 pm

          This article is about when and how to file complaint (administrative/vigilance) against judge for misconduct/corruption etc.

          Now: Your question is whether contempt of court is applicable?

          Contempt of court is a different area of law and you should study Contempt of Courts Act for that. Whether the matter could not be disposed off within 4 months 4 different times – well it could be because of genuine reasons, and to my knowledge such directions to dispose off within certain time are kind of advisory rather than binding.

          It’s also a matter of concern that a HC has issued same direction 4 different times – which implies so much of time in HC is being taken up for such matters which are not primarily about adjudication of a dispute but only about giving direction for speedy disposal to a trial court.

          To find out whether it can fall under contempt of court or not – you should check with a knowledgable advocate. A simple way to assess this could be to post your question with details that you have shared on one of online (paid) legal query websites where qualified advocates can provide answer to your question. That may get you much better results for lesser money spent than meeting 1-2 advocates in person.

          Whether a complaint can be filed?

          It’s difficult to say if I rely only on the information given. If you have data to prove that there were other IAs/cases which were without any direction by HC or filed later than your case so should be on lower priority to finish them off, and they have been disposed off whereas your IA has been kept pending for so long inspite of directions by HC, then it could become a case where questions can be raised. But still it is a complicated issue, so I would suggest to first find answer to your “contempt of court” question as I have suggested above, and only after that you may explore the complaint approach. Filing a complaint without good grounds and clear evidence is not suggested.

          Reply
  8. Prasad a.a says

    April 20, 2019 at 10:14 am

    What is the procedure for filing a complaint against a munsif in Thrissur court who had issued a temporary injunction order without hearing the opposite party and fake claims

    Reply
    • videv says

      May 10, 2019 at 4:24 pm

      I suggest you should first do some study on how legal procedures and courts work, and read this article again on what are valid grounds for complaint against a judge.

      Temporary injunction orders can be issued based on submissions made by petitioner/plaintiff in first hearing. If the claims are fake, then you should take it judicially by filing your response, and getting the injunction removed, and any damages if applicable.

      Reply
  9. Madhavan says

    March 29, 2019 at 5:23 am

    I have made a complaint to regrvigil.tn@nic.in regarding stay revival by Madras High Court clear two months after the labour court taking over the case on account of stay lapse due to 6-month norm set by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

    Original date of stay on TRIAL is: 10.11.2017. Case taken back by the labour court on: 1.12.2018. Stay revived by Madras High Court on: 18.2.2019.

    My contention is: Is Madras HC right it reviving the stay after the Labour Court had taken back the case on account of Circular from the Hon’ble Supreme Court which says lower court need not wait for orders from the high court after the expiry of six-month stay timeline and it can take back the case and proceed to hear the case from where it was left stranded because of stay.

    Reply
    • videv says

      March 29, 2019 at 10:18 pm

      Does the order for stay revival give valid reasons? For how much time has the stay been extended? What is next stage of hearing?

      Complaint is right approach when there is clear or reasonably good proof of bias, misconduct, corruption, or behaviour unbecoming of a judicial officer.

      From details given, it doesn’t appear to be the case. If you can prove some kind of bias or corruption in how the order was stay revival was given, then it may be a fit case.

      Reply
  10. Piyush Gaur says

    March 9, 2019 at 10:52 am

    sir,
    My case hearing on 498A in Lakhimpur Khiri, Uttar Pradesh since 2017.
    Judge makes bad behaviour with me and my family.
    We were present at the time of hearing and judge issued warrant on the same day, When our lawyer asked why he did this, Judge order to police officers for taked us in custody.
    we already completed our bail against this case.
    What will we do?
    Can we file any complaint against Judge?

    Reply
    • videv says

      March 9, 2019 at 11:32 am

      Complaint can be filed if it’s judicial misconduct or corruption. It’s not clear why the warrant was issued when accused were present. Get certified copies of order sheets including on that day when warrant issued. Also CC of bail order.

      1. In order sheets, attendance of accused should be marked; else it’s possibly perverse order.

      2. Warrant should be mentioned in order sheet. If not mentioned then it’s problem. Also if warrant mentioned but no proper reason given about need for issuing warrant then it could be a case of misconduct. You have to check with your advocate or some knowledgeable lawyer showing them certified copies of the order sheets, and the bail order.

      Reply
  11. sudheer says

    November 4, 2018 at 9:21 am

    after marriage i found out that my wife was a transgender operated to create an artificial vagina by her mother.I filed for divorce for null and void. But the judge did not order medical and instead sent me to mediation. also my lawyer misguided me and did not guide me properly during the mediation.Also i had audio recordings of the wife and her mother in which they clearly accept that she cannot have physical relationship but my lawyer did not submit those in court.I was threatened for life by wife’s mother in the mediation session and forced to sign a mutual divorce.I was alone in mediation but 5 members of wife’s family were there.Even my father was not allowed inside. The councellor’s behavior was rude towards me. Later i learnt that she was a family friend of my wife.The final signature for the mutual settlement were not done before the judge. He was inside his chamber and not sitting in the court. But my lawyer again cheated me and told that it is normal.Also after signature in the court my wife again verbally threatened me and told me that she will take my eyes out.They had also filed a 377 case against me which turned out to be false but the police report is signed on the next day of my signing for mutual settlement. I complained to my lawyer to take file a complaint against all this but he told me to wait till first motion.Just one day before first motion he filed my petition to restore my case to original status.But he said that he cannot use the reason of me being threatened as it will affect my job.The judge refused to hear any arguments and told me either get my petition dismissed or proceed for first motion. Feeling cheated and helpless i filed for first motion. It is a big racket. The wife’s parents and uncle are doctors at high posts in central and state hospitals.It is obvious that they have bribed my lawyer but i have no proof. What can i do in this situation

    Reply
    • videv says

      November 4, 2018 at 9:58 pm

      “My lawyer cheated me” = “I don’t know abc of legal procedures” OR “I took the easy route because I can’t fight, but now I’m here to act as the victim!”

      >>But the judge did not order medical and instead sent me to mediation.

      Mediation is normal in all matrimonial procedures, being part of Family Courts Act. Judge is not a wishmaster that he will grant wish to order medical of wife (or husband) simply on first instance of making an allegation.

      >>The councellor’s behavior was rude towards me.

      I haven’t heard of a counsellor who is more polite to husbands than to wives.

      >>They had also filed a 377 case against me which turned out to be false but the police report is signed on the next day of my signing for mutual settlement. I complained to my lawyer to take file a complaint against all this…

      After mutual settlement, complaints are not taken. If you can fight, then don’t go for mutual divorce and fight on merits.

      >>But he said that he cannot use the reason of me being threatened as it will affect my job

      What kind of joke is this? How can complaint mentioning being threatened lead to job loss? Are they going to send complaint directly to employer?

      >>The wife’s parents and uncle are doctors at high posts in central and state hospitals

      Even doctors at high posts can’t convert a transgender into a woman.

      >>It is obvious that they have bribed my lawyer but i have no proof.

      More likely, the lawyer is trying to get you out of cases based on his own assessment of what you will be able to take.

      You can let go of lawyer (take a NOC vakalth) and go party-in-person, withdraw mutual divorce petition, and reinstate the annulment case. Or change the lawyer and do the same. The annulment case was very strong and was the right step. Everything after that has been a cop out.

      Reply
  12. Rajasekhar says

    October 19, 2018 at 10:13 am

    I am from Pune and my daughter in law has filed many false cases against our family in Hyderabad.
    One of them is DVC case filed in Dec 2016. My self and my wife are senior citizens.I am having Diabetus and I am also a kidney patient.I have applied petition under 205 in June 2017. The judge took up the matter in Oct 2018 after repeated requests. During the hearing he has mentioned that he can not accept it as it is only on medical grounds. He has also humiliated me saying the following :
    – What is this senior citizen , junior citizen ……

    – Nowadays everyone has got diabetus and kidney problems…
    He uttered these sentences with a wild laugh.
    Later he was not ready to listen anything from my advocate or me.

    I was told by my advocate that for DV case respondent’s presence is mandatory.
    This judge is expecting that we should come every time all the way from Pune.

    Suggest future course of action.

    Reply
    • videv says

      October 21, 2018 at 9:21 pm

      >>I was told by my advocate that for DV case respondent’s presence is mandatory.

      Only for Respondent no 1 who is husband. For others, I haven’t seen people going to courts everytime or even once in a while. That’s because mostly the reliefs in DV case are of civil remedies and mainly against husband and it operates like a quasi civil case.

      If the husband is not appearing in court, then someone from family may need to appear.

      >>– What is this senior citizen , junior citizen ……
      – Nowadays everyone has got diabetus and kidney problems…
      He uttered these sentences with a wild laugh.

      Assess these in light of what I said above. If Respondent 1 husband is appearing in this case, then it might be a fit case for complaint against judge.

      This judgment should be used for personal exemption for reason of long distance between place of residence and trial court. As per this judgment, there is NO need to give any other reason like medical etc:

      https://menrightsindia.net/2018/08/exemption-from-personal-appearance-to-be-granted-for-reason-of-long-distance-between-accuseds-residence-and-place-of-trial-supreme-court-in-ipc-498a-dp-act-case.html

      Reply
  13. Prince says

    September 12, 2018 at 6:06 am

    Do you get a acknowledgement after a email complaint is sent to the RG Supreme court / High Court? Any idea what happens after a email complaint and time frame to get a reply?

    Reply
    • videv says

      September 13, 2018 at 8:06 pm

      AFAIK, the people who have actually filed complaint have done it in writing (paper), and so I don’t know about what happens to the complaints sent via email. You can always follow up by filing RTI with reference to action taken on the complaint via email.

      Karnataka HC has a circular/guideline that all such complaints against judicial officers be made by way of affidavit, to check misuse. In that case, email won’t do.

      Reply
  14. Arun Kumar Sharma says

    July 22, 2018 at 2:32 am

    Sir, I had taken loan of Rs. 30000/- in year 1999 from a local money lender, sir I had paid him. A blank cheque was issued in good faith to him as a security. Sir in March 2013 he had filled the blank cheque amounting of Rs 3,00,000/- which was then returned without giving any notice. Sir now I had a notice under section 138 at Jt. JMFC on dated 15/04/2013. District court give decision against me request you to advise to face the same.

    Reply
    • videv says

      July 23, 2018 at 12:02 am

      You should contact your lawyers for these kind of issues, we are not lawyers.

      Court went by evidence on record, and you probably couldn’t prove that a blank cheque was given in good faith. What was the need to give a blank cheque?

      Also, if you could prove that the loan taken was only 30,000, and nothing afterwards that should have been taken into account.

      Reply
  15. gkmurthy says

    April 23, 2018 at 5:28 am

    On 4/22/2018 the President of India cleared an Ordinance. Hanging to those Rapists who rape girls below certain age. Good. But RIGHT TO LIVE AND LIFE IS ALSO THERE.It is a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. Cabinet cannot act as an AX MAN. It is the Parliament which is Supreme. Regarding FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS there shall not be Ordinances. There shall be a BILL
    Gkmurthy

    Reply
  16. Ziaur Rahman says

    March 12, 2018 at 7:49 pm

    One of my clients whose wife deserted him has filed a case against the entire family members including the school going minor daughter (17 years)under D.V Act. The Magistrate has summoned all of them. What should be my step to discharge or alienate the case of the minor girl. We have to file the written objection of the plaint of wife. Whether we should make submission to separate the case and try it at JJ Board or carry on in the same court. Kindly guide.

    Reply
    • videv says

      March 12, 2018 at 11:38 pm

      DV is mostly civil case (like CrPC 125), even though the procedures/trial is under CrPC. Not sure about the JJ Board part, (I’m not even a lawyer in case you thought so)

      Reply
  17. Afzal says

    February 14, 2018 at 7:47 pm

    Dear Sir,

    My sister had filed an FIR against her husband under various sections which seems to diluted as the husband is brother-in-law of CJM in that area and hence no police officer is ready to file chargesheet as per the FIR made due to very serious pressure from CJM which has even informed by the Investigating Officer (IO) in particular said case. Now,we feel very dejected and getting justice to my sister looks very far and almost negligible due to this CJM. Hence, I request the ways in which we could have chargesheet file without any pressure from CJM and secondly what are the ways to bring CJM under law for questioning for influencing the case by using his post??

    Reply
    • videv says

      February 16, 2018 at 3:36 pm

      Unless you have some serious evidence against CJM, it is better not to speculate what’s happening in the background, but pursue with police/IO about investigation and charge-sheeting. Police is not under CJM or judiciary in general. Complaint can be filed against IO instead to higher police authorities, let him/her explain about CJM etc to them.

      Reply
  18. Md kaif says

    February 6, 2018 at 8:02 am

    If CJM court judge expected to involve in corruption and favouring his judgement then what should be my step against that judge?

    Reply
    • videv says

      February 7, 2018 at 6:32 pm

      You need to have solid proof of corruption, only then this article is applicable. For bad judicial decisions, appeal to higher courts is the only way.

      Reply
  19. Vanka Prathap says

    January 27, 2018 at 6:25 am

    i have filed a FIR against Mr.Vithal kusuma and others for selling my lands without ownership or authority in sec 468,471,406,419,420,120-B, 447,427, 506, of IPC, the accused is very influential and got me arrested in counter case in spite of HIGH COURT order not to ARREST,, he is threatening he knows few judges with names that i will never get an order in this case ,,i want to complaint about this judges ,,i dont want any action on judges but these peopel should not help him and i losing my basic fundalmental rights , kindly advice

    Reply
    • videv says

      January 30, 2018 at 11:02 am

      case lies against police who arrested despite stay on arrest, not judge.

      Reply
  20. S Saykar says

    December 22, 2017 at 1:22 am

    Sir if a judge says , “I will not give you parity if you want you can argue “ before listening to the accused side
    So my question is , is it okey or should I file an complaint?

    Reply
    • videv says

      December 26, 2017 at 8:57 pm

      ‘Accused’ word is used in criminal trials. I don’t understand what is meant by ‘parity’ in such trial of accused since anyway it’s prosecution who have burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. Difficult to say without knowing the context, but probably it’s not a case of misconduct.

      Reply
  21. Rajalakshmi says

    September 14, 2017 at 6:03 pm

    Complaint Letter
    14.09.2016
    Kurinjipadi

    From,
    S.Rajalakshimi
    3/41/45, K. K. Nagar
    Kurinjipadi
    Cuddalore Dist. 607302

    To,
    The High court Vigilance Officer
    High court
    Chennai..

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    I was field FIR on 17.7 2013 under the section S417, 506(ii) IPC, R/W of TNWH Act against P.Arumugam. (Accused – P.Arumugam) The accused was escaped from India from the date of FIR. With continuous effort by us On 10 th January 2016 accused was arrested while reach at Koyambuttur Airport. The information was shared to local police about accused arrival and then local police was arrested based on order given by ADSP and SP. And then the local police went to Koyambuttur Airport and then accused was arrested.

    On 10 th January night accused reached at Mahila court with local police. The court was decided to put him on Jail. On 27 th January night accused was released by court with condition Bail. Accused and his relative were threading /cautioned us after his release.

    We had given complaints to High court vigilance officer on 21.1.2016 & 20.06.2016 to enquire about Mahila court and then cancel the wrong order given by Mahila court for issuing of Bail and passport to impeached.

    And then the Hight cout was ordered to take one time DNA test , both the part were agreed , the result has come positively and its proved , that the girl baby father is accused,
    The case redirected to cuddalore Mahila court for the review. The entire affidavit was with favor of complainant.

    But the Mahila court has fix the judgment date on 14.09.17, Today the Mahila court judge Mr.Selvam has informed the accused in a single work your are released. Where is the justice? Hence the judgment was wrong in spite of produced all the proves.

    Hence I request to take the action on Mahila court Judge for the wrong judgment and accused has to be punished, we want justice before i die, justice to win,,

    We request Honorable vigilance officer to take necessary action on immediate basis about Mahila court & Accused.

    Respected By
    S,Rajalakshmi

    Reply
    • videv says

      September 16, 2017 at 9:07 pm

      You have to send it yourselves directly to the vigilance officer etc as applicable. This article is only to provide information. We cannot initiate complaint on anyone’s behalf.

      Reply
    • Sathya says

      November 7, 2017 at 11:59 am

      HI I am sathya. I want to know how to complain against court. I applied divorce case in June 2015 . But my maximum hearing passed only in strike. But magistrate put next hearing 2 months gap. I am really disappointed. Advocate and court makes this strike but petitioner only affected. I need some solution for this problem

      Reply
      • videv says

        November 7, 2017 at 4:24 pm

        Complaint can’t be filed against court for delays due to strike etc

        Reply
  22. sfAhmed says

    August 27, 2017 at 9:21 am

    sir, how to make a real dv case by wife seem false by husband

    Reply
    • videv says

      August 29, 2017 at 5:15 pm

      We give only legal advice here… but maybe many people think if law misuse can be done by women, then men may also have some laws or legal loopholes which they can use to counter wife’s law misuse, and let’s go to men’s rights folks to learn! Such is the level of knowledge and mindset about how law is supposed to work.

      Reply
  23. chander arya says

    August 20, 2017 at 11:53 am

    Sir, My financial parameters changes since 2009 when my father passed away due to huge business loss and after onwards i am trying my most best to even survive, my wife left 2009 due our financial and 2012 i somehow request her to come back but she stay 4 months and left again and filled the DV maintence case. she said my earning 5lacs per month base our previous family company and i didn’t even filling my reguler ITRs those filled are NIL since 200, the company she mentioned is non operational since 2009, given my bank statements and written arguments,

    Ms. Swati katiyar-MM TIS HAZARI court, she replaced Ms. meenu Kashhik few days ago n on final arguments she was kind of rude and even didn’t bother to hear us after arising my hands 2 times and passed the order 50000/- RUPEEE PER MONTH TO PAY FROM THE 2013, ofcourse i have choice to suicide but I wanted to fight before i leave my body,, CAN ANYONE PLEASE HELP

    Reply
  24. Vipul says

    August 15, 2017 at 11:25 pm

    I am advocate in mehsana district court. When i was get to my notary advocate form in bank manager sign so manager said that it is not my duty. So plz advice

    Reply
    • videv says

      August 16, 2017 at 1:52 pm

      Question is not clear. Bank managers may give signature/seal on documents which can verify customer’s bank statement and other such documents etc, whether it is duty of bank manager or not, you can check RBI site or see how other banks are doing.

      Reply
  25. Daljit Singh says

    May 4, 2017 at 6:39 pm

    In brief Sir my divorce application has been transfered at my wife place due to cheating and not filling my reply by my advocate and kept me in dark in the punjab and high court please advise me the remedy can i file the review petition in high court and where to complain of advocate of cheating pls advise me

    Reply
    • videv says

      May 4, 2017 at 9:57 pm

      Advocate misconduct is a different thing which I will cover in separate post. It will be complaint to bar council of state. You have to file that and alongwith apply for review etc to HC mentioning reference to bar council complaint etc with copy of complaint.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines:

👉Kannada/ Hindi/ English: Call Sharath +919738010456
👉Free guidance (10-15 min)
👉Paid Guidance (For 30 min or more), click to pay

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India


Take Quizzes to test your legal knowledge!

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


👉(Read Online eBook)👈
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Contribute via UPI: videv@upi / videv@icici / videv@paytm

Today’s Popular Posts

  • How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC…
  • How to file objections/written statement to…
  • Basic Cross-examination techniques in matrimonial…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell,…
  • Section 41, 41A, 41B of CrPC which govern arrest by…
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • Contact
  • How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125…
  • How to complain against judges of trial courts, High…
  • Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance,…

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

UN super agency to help women or help radical feminists?

10 Jul 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Supreme court says let adamant husbands be raped by 498a, but spare old parents

10 Dec 2014 By videv 8 Comments

Bite the Big Dog and save yourself!

12 Nov 2009 By videv Leave a Comment

CEDAW: or how I invited UN to destroy my family and country

11 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

You think feminism made US women happy? Data says just opposite

18 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • videv on Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance, divorce etc.
  • Ankur on Mumbai Bandra Family court judgment on joint equally shared custody based on parenting plan
  • Khushi on Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance, divorce etc.
  • videv on Yodha Strategies and Techniques – YS101 course
  • videv on How to handle allegation of impotence by wife

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts