Men Rights India

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » Activism » Reform Advocates Act for benefit of common public and litigants

Reform Advocates Act for benefit of common public and litigants

22 Aug 2016 By videv 6 Comments

Law Commission has recently asked for opinions from stakeholders on reforms required in the Advocates Act, 1961, the last date of which is 31st Aug 2016.  So interested people can read the analysis and suggestions below, and send whatever suggestions they agree with to lci-dla@nic.in

šŸ‘‰(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act šŸ‘ˆ

šŸ‘‰(Read Online eBook): Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu LawšŸ‘ˆ
Contents hide
1 Bar councils fail to enforce violation of standards by advocates
2 Common public unaware of standards of conduct, and duties of advocate towards client
2.1 Suggestion 1: Give copy of bar council rules about duty of advocate towards client
2.2 Suggestion 2 (alternative to 1 above): Amend Advocates Act to include rules on duty of advocate towards client
3 Violent/unbecoming/unlawful behaviour by advocates not punished
3.1 Suggestion 3: The Advocates Act needs to be amended to make it simpler to punish violations of law by advocates.
4 Suggestion 4: Need simple and effective mechanism of complaint and grievance redressal of clients against advocates
4.1 Suggestion 5: Need to remove consent to change advocates

https://www.facebook.com/Law-Commission-of-India-1661261260775559/?fref=nf

Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India , in criminal appeal No.63 of 2006, Mahipal Singh Rana v. State of U.P., has asked the Law Commission of India ā€œto go into all relevant aspects relating to regulation of legal profession in consultation with all concernedā€ at an early date. In view of this, the Law Commission of India has undertaken the study of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Law Commission of India requests all the stakeholders to send their comments at lci-dla@nic.in, not later than 31 August 2016.

The Mahipal Singh judgment referred above can be seen here: http://www.livelaw.in/urgent-need-review-regulatory-mechanism-legal-profession-sc/

Here are some points about need for much higher standards of professionalism needed among advocates as a group, and also towards clients and litigants who are made to suffer for no fault of theirs due to lack of enforcement of professional standards on advocates.

Bar councils fail to enforce violation of standards by advocates

As pointed out by Supreme Court in Mahipal Singh Rana v. State of U.P judgment, the SC has observed that both bar council of UP and bar council of India failed to take any action against the said advocate.  Excerpt below:

We may now come to the direction to be issued to the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh or to the Bar Council of India. In the present case, inspite of direction of the High Court as long back as more than ten years, no action is shown to have been taken by the Bar Council. Notice was issued by this Court to the Bar Council of India on 27th January, 2006 and after all the facts having been brought to the notice of the Bar Council of India, the said Bar Council has also failed to take any action. In view of such failure of the statutory obligation of the Bar Council of the State of Uttar Pradesh as well as the Bar Council of India, this Court has to exercise appellate jurisdiction under the Advocates Act in view of proved misconduct calling for disciplinary action

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/urgent-need-review-regulatory-mechanism-legal-profession-sc/

While I do not have a specific suggestion on how this can be fixed, it seems regulation of advocates by bar councils is almost not working, so there needs to be overhaul of Advocates Act so that public can have some faith restored that bar councils or a new regulatory body can do the job of punishing violations of standards of conduct by advocates.

Common public unaware of standards of conduct, and duties of advocate towards client

The Advocates Act, 1961 defines the process and rules by which Bar council of India and State level bar councils can be constituted, and how they can frame their rules to regulate and give licenses to advocates to practise, and to inform about and enforce standards of professional conduct.  But these kind of details about existence of Advocates Act and how bar councils make rules to govern advocates are almost not known to public.  Common public is almost unaware of how and where to complain if they have any problem of unprofessional conduct by their advocate.  A few suggestions can be made:

READ:  Government proposes making IPC 498A compoundable

Suggestion 1: Give copy of bar council rules about duty of advocate towards client

A copy of state bar council rules which govern professional duties of advocates towards client to be given to client by advocate when a vakalatnama is signed.  It should list all duties of advocate towards client.  At the beginning of any case whether civil or criminal, the judge should ask the litigants(s) to make sure that they have received that copy and only then the case should proceed.  This is a simple and practical suggestion which is not difficult or costly to implement.

Suggestion 2 (alternative to 1 above): Amend Advocates Act to include rules on duty of advocate towards client

An alternative suggestion is that to simplify the understanding for common public about what duties advocate has towards clients, the most important rules of professional conduct towards clients can be made part of the Advocates Act itself, rather than leaving it to the bar councils to define it as part of bar council rules.  This makes lot of sense since the rules of professional conduct and duty towards clients are things which cannot change form state to state, so there is no great hindrance why they cannot be made part of the Advocates Act itself.

Violent/unbecoming/unlawful behaviour by advocates not punished

It is commonly seen that Indian advocates in all states and cities indulge from time to time in collective disruption, strike, violence be it in cities of Bangalore, Ghaziabad, Meerut or Chennai.  Usually every 3-6 months or so there is one such news.  Just a quick Google search returned sample of news items below all of them being from last few years:

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/lawyers-police-fight-pitched-battles-in-madras-high-court/article358826.ece

http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/bangalore-lawyers-attack-reporters-with-stones-iron-chairs-181830

http://www.rediff.com/news/2009/mar/06lawyers-provoked-madras-hc-violence-sc-committee.htm

http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/violence-mars-lawyers-agitation-in-meerut-414614

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2014/04/17/233–Ghaziabad-lawyers-agitation-turns-violent-.html

At the same time, citizens are supposed to uphold judiciary (and lawyers) in high esteem because some manuals and codes have been written giving sermons on duties of advocates, expected ethics, high standards of behaviour and what not.

Apart from above, there has been recent news of disruption and violence by some advocates in Chennai.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-frowns-at-violence-by-lawyers-in-madras-hc/article7673680.ece

Law applies to all except advocates!: The public is made to believe that they should not take law into their own hands.  But it seems, a totally different standard is used when it’s lawyers who have any grouse or grievance.  Not only they take law into their hands and indulge in group violence, there is hardly any news ever that such advocates have received any kind of punishment or debarring from legal practice for even a small period of time.

It is a matter of grave concern that advocates themselves act in ways which shows that they do not have much confidence in legal and judicial processes.  When that is the case, it’s a matter of huge hypocrisy to tell common citizens that they should abide by the law.  Indeed, the impression one gets is that if one knows the law well, one can indulge in violent and unlawful behaviour, and no one can touch them!

Suggestion 3: The Advocates Act needs to be amended to make it simpler to punish violations of law by advocates.

If the legal profession needs to keep its image of upholder of justice, then violation of laws by advocates should not be tolerated, because that gives the clear message to public that you can indulge in violence and break laws if you know more about law than others.  Also, the failure of bar councils to act against erring advocates gives the message that the bar councils are acting in ways to protect advocates who are members of the club, than protecting and enforcing standards of membership of the club.

READ:  Proposal to amend Domestic Violence (DV) Act to protect mothers in law

Suggestion 4: Need simple and effective mechanism of complaint and grievance redressal of clients against advocates

Following are commonly seen unprofessional behaviour of advocates towards clients:

  1. Taking advantage of client who has approached advocate through a known reference who is a relative, friend, common acquaintance, common neighbour; and taking advance fees ranging in tens of thousands in promise of doing some work; but then keeping quiet or not doing any or little work for the client.  The client who has approached the advocate through a common acquaintance loses both money as well as trust in legal process at the very first step itself.
  2. Not appearing in the court on hearing date.  Also, not caring to inform client about it either.
  3. Having client pay the cost to court for non-appearance of advocate or delays due to advocate.  Many a time the advocates do not appear on the hearing date, and the court imposes a cost on the litigant whose advocate has failed to appear.  This is a cruel joke on litigants that they end up paying cost which should have been paid by advocate instead.  Again, the lack of awareness of rules of duty towards clients by advocates, combined with the fact that bar councils seem to protect their own; means that there is almost nil chance any client will complain about advocate to bar council or try to recover the paid cost from advocate’s fees.
  4. Taking large amount of advance fees from client which may be justifiably earned only over several years of legal representation.  Many clients tend to plan for expenses in advance, and they think that by giving advance fees, they don’t have to plan for further legal expense for next 2 years or so at least.  But they are in for a rude shock when the advocate later starts acting unprofessionally as mentioned in other points.  Even if the client is able to change the advocate, he/she stands to lose that advance fees given since most clients don’t have requisite knowledge of law and rules to complain against an advocate.  That combined with the fact that bar councils have failed to take action in many instances against erring advocates, makes the situation grim for litigants and common public.
  5. A common complaint heard from litigants is that their advocate has started ā€˜collaborating’ with the opposite party.  This is a very commonly heard complaint in public, yet there is hardly any actual complaints being filed for this kind of behaviour, most probably because the litigants don’t have any hard evidence to prove it, and also because they lack knowledge of law to collect such evidence and then further complain to bar council.  It would be unwise to dismiss such opinions of general public as imaginative thinking, since it strikes at the roots of confidence public should normally have in judicial processes and legal professionals.
  6. Misusing provision of consent of fellow advocate to appear for client.  Bar council rules say that a new advocate should take consent from previous advocate of the client.  While this is meant as consent between advocates, in practise this has become source of major harassment and grief for litigants who want to change their advocate, but are made to run around by existing advocate who makes it seem that the client needs a no objection certificate (NOC) from advocate to appoint a new advocate.  Nothing can be more damning than this fact that a paying client is made to beg for NOC from his/her own advocate, when the normal process in other professions is that client is free to choose and change his professional without any kind of objection or hindrance from existing professional.  Advocates Act should be amended to remove need of any consent from one advocate to another.  Most advocates charge fees in advance from clients, so it is clients who need to be protected rather than advocates.
READ:  Do not let custody row adversely affect child: Delhi HC

A simpler mechanism needs to be put in place preferably in Advocates Act itself which defines the duties of advocates towards clients and acceptable conduct, and how clients/litigants can file complaints to a regulatory body to get their matter resolved.  Whether bar council itself can be that regulatory body or a new ombudsman kind of body needs to be defined can be discussed further.

Suggestion 5: Need to remove consent to change advocates

Bar council of India defines this rule: http://www.barcouncilofindia.org/about/professional-standards/rules-on-professional-standards/

5. Consent of fellow advocate to appear

An advocate should not appear in any matter where another advocate has filed a vakalt or memo for the same party. However, the advocate can take the consent of the other advocate for appearing.

In case, an advocate is not able to present the consent of the advocate who has filed the matter for the same party, then he should apply to the court for appearance. He shall in such application mention the reason as to why he could not obtain such consent. He shall appear only after obtaining the permission of the Court.

Elaborating further, the need to have consent to change advocates should be removed for following reasons:

  1. The said rule was made by bar council ostensibly to protect advocates from one another, rather than clients and public.  A fundamental question needs to be asked: when it’s advocates who take fees from clients/litigants are supposed to provide professional service in return, why should the clients/litigants have to face any hurdle in changing the advocate if they are unable to get the required service or professional behaviour?  There are no such rules in other professions like doctors and Chartered Accountants, which also have regulatory bodies with licensing and disciplinary mechanism.
  2. This rule is more in nature of union regulation.  It serves to regulate the pool of advocates, but goes against interest of litigants and ultimately against delivery of justice.
  3. Further, if the justification of this rule is that it will discourage unhealthy competition among advocates to grab clients, that reasoning doesn’t stand detailed scrutiny.  Every individual, including advocates, have right to practise their trade /profession; and this kind of rule flies in the face of that since it prevents a lawyer from giving service to litigant who is stuck with a bad or non-performing existing advocate.  It tends to encourage behaviour by advocates where they can focus more on grabbing a client initially, and then slack off, rather than providing professional service over the course of full trial etc.
  4. By removing this rule, those advocates who work in a professional manner while giving conscientious and good service to litigants, will get rewarded over the long term.  As of now, it is the other way round that those advocates who are smarter in ā€˜bagging’ the clients initially will have a more flourishing practice.

Links to Free eBooks

1. Download my free PDF eBook Surviving the Legal Jungle

2. Read this FREE eBook written by fathers involved in child custody issues (Read Online) (PDF book)

3. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Read Online)

Links to Paid eBooks/Books


1. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

2. Self-study Book on Divorce for Men (Digital eBook Only)

3. Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

Related Posts

  1. Want to save your property? Oppose Marriage Laws Amendment (2010) bill
  2. Send email/post to law commission to implement shared parenting law to get better child access/custody/visitation
  3. Mailing addresses of PM, law minister, finance minister, VHP, RSS etc
  4. Law commission recommends amendments to HMGA, 1956 and GWA, 1890 for joint custody and shared parenting

Filed Under: Activism Tagged With: Law Commission, Law Making, Lawyers

Comments

  1. Manju D says

    August 30, 2016 at 10:59 am

    Pls reform

    Reply
  2. SM Meyyappan says

    August 29, 2016 at 5:18 pm

    1) Lawyers payment method to be described and provision of detailed receipt to be made mandatory
    2) lawyers to pay professional tax and Service tax
    3) Asset declaration to be made mandatory for Senior advocates and government attorneys or whomsoever arguing for government cases.
    4) Obdusman type body is necessary, as we common public and litigants have lost faith in gunda giri club of lawyers(so called Bar Councils).
    5) Not only lawyers, even grievance with judiciary to be looked by Obdusman, not the judiciary itself

    Reply
  3. Shylesh says

    August 23, 2016 at 6:37 pm

    Most of advocates are not trustworthy and mingle with opposition parties. I video proof which can prove that he has cheated me but still Iam not filig complaint against him. Reasons given below.
    1. if you complaint against any advocate about his misdeeds the advocates association stands behind him and you will not get any advocates fight cases if you have.
    2. since judge was also lawyer at one time he will support the advocate rather than complianant.
    3. Even reforms comes also advocates are who cheat you even they destroy you.
    4. Fighting and winning a case is really tedious task rouge advocates.

    MOney minded advocates are there everywhere.

    Reply
    • videv says

      August 24, 2016 at 10:36 am

      If you have made up your mind not to do something, some reasons can always be found to support that decision.

      Reply
  4. Gurcharan Kaur says

    August 23, 2016 at 3:27 pm

    Namaskar !!!
    Today i am writing you after losing all the hopes in our judiciary and system being an elderly senior citizen. My daughter-in law Dipti Mahindru who is a practicing advocate at Amritsar district courts has trapped me and my family in frivolous and false cases of 498a, 406 and few others. Also she moved an application for 307 and 323 against us. Further with folded hands i would like to seek help from your end as i and my family has lost all the hopes to get out of this “Chakraviyu” together prepared by my daughter in law along with members and president of Bar Association Amritsar. We are totally drained out of money fighting cases as not a single person is ready to listen to us even. Judges are favoring advocates being from same profession. My family has totally broken out and don’t know what to do. My daughter in law has ripped us apart to grab my property and used a web to trap us. me and my husband who are above 70s and having no strong financial background. My son who is the only earning person in family is under big threat. Justice is far away thing; even no one is listening to us. Further i would like to request you to kindly make changes in the law as girls these days using it a solid weapon to get money and property of in-laws. i m failed to understand that do we have the right to speak, right to live peacefully and right to get justice???? Are we living in a developing country???? Is this the democracy??? Sir, if everyone knows that the law is being misused and families are being ruined or making suicides….. then why not we change law ??? why the gender biased law ??? Is this a jungle where the bigger animal only can live by hunting down the small or the weak…. I understand girls are also being tortured for dowry in our country but on other side if girls are taking law into their own hands then who will protect the innocent who become victims and destroys whole life fighting false cases. So you are requested with folded hands to take this matter seriously and act soon. I hope to get justice from your end as soon as possible. Thanks and Regards …. Gurcharan kaur / +91 9464627878

    Reply
    • videv says

      August 24, 2016 at 10:34 am

      >> ā€œChakraviyuā€ together prepared by my daughter in law along with members and president of Bar Association Amritsar

      You can send information about this to law commission too

      >>Further i would like to request you to kindly make changes in the law as girls these days using it a solid weapon to get money and property of in-laws.

      Women don’t have any right to in-laws or even husband’s self-acquired property bought from own funds… it’s just that people want a quicker solution that they settle and pay money to get rid of cases. For changing laws, people have to send feedback to lawmakers, and this post is meant to point just one such opportunity.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines (for quick guidance only):
(Be respectful to volunteers, & we don't advise on divorce)

1. Kannada/Hindi/English: +919738010456
2. Tamil/English: +919962514226

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups for FREE guidance/discussion

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


šŸ‘‰(Read Online eBook)šŸ‘ˆ
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Today’s Popular Posts

  • How to file objections/written statement to…
  • Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance,…
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • How to complain against judges of trial courts, High…
  • How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125…
  • How to draft a child custody (GWC) petition
  • Section 41, 41A, 41B of CrPC which govern arrest by…
  • How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC…
  • Basic Cross-examination techniques in matrimonial…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

NBW (arrest warrant) issued against woman for false dowry harassment case

24 Sep 2014 By videv 6 Comments

Women organisations and Domestic Violence industry exposed in Shoaib Malik case

12 Apr 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

NCW harassing women, is that news to me?

9 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Judgments related to passport impounding

6 Aug 2009 By videv Leave a Comment

Chennai HC explains the ‘secrets’ of how family courts (don’t) work in India

30 Jan 2015 By videv 2 Comments

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • videv on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • Raghu on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • videv on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • P2 on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Child visitation monitor New Haven on Strategy for Child Custody for Men

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts