One of our group members from Pune sent a clipping of news of maintenance denied to wife from a Marathi newspaper. His comment below:
This order is of rejected maintenance to wife. Maintenance rejected because husband provided proofs of her Facebook and gmail accounts that she was chatting with her friends. Also proofs were provided of her mobile call records, and it was told to court that mother and sister both are working as well as petitioner was working before but not now. Keeping all this in mind there is no need of maintenance to wife.
The news clipping is below:
Read my maintenance book (DV and CrPC 125) if you want to save HARD EARNED money. Use coupon code MenToo to get 52% discount and help it win Sales Contest to promote #MenToo awareness. (Kindle eBook version) (Print Paperback version)
Download my free PDF eBook Surviving the Legal Jungle
Don't be a lone ranger... JOIN our Facebook group to connect
Read this FREE eBook written by fathers involved in child custody issues(PDF book)
Even though I don’t speak Marathi, like Sherlock Holmes I went down to the task of trying to read whatever words I could understand from the news, to make some educated guess on what might have happened:
- First para says application rejected.
- Second para says wife filed allegations of mental and physical cruelty. There is also mention of 5 lakh in second para. Not sure if it is maintenance demand per month, alleged dowry demand, or compensation amount demanded under DV (Domestic Violence) Act. Second para also says there was demand of compensation, maintenance, and interim maintenance. I am assuming word “potagi” means maintenance, and a quick google search confirms my guess is right.
- Third para says husband went abroad for job. Not sure whether abroad or just outside of home state. All allegations of wife found false. Husband proved woman was continuously chatting on Facebook and Gmail with friends doing gossip etc. Petitioner woman was educated, and was working earlier. Therefore there is no need of maintenance, was argued by husband and upheld by court.
Game over! 
Sunil wagh says
August 16, 2017 at 8:13 amMy wife field against me DV & crpc 125 she is graduate and I also gov servant can he get maintenance in both cases my monthly income after deducting 16000 can how much get maintenance by me? And I can apply against interim maintenance order?
videv says
August 16, 2017 at 1:50 pmMaintenance cases have to be taken seriously and all facts have to be told to court. Only an astrologer should be asked to predict amount of maintenance.
Once maintenance is ordered, one can always appeal but it’s one more headache, and the first maintenance amount can act like a benchmark in mind of judge who reviews the original order.
p s n kumar says
December 13, 2015 at 2:38 pmHow can i get a pdf copy of the judgement or atleast case no. I am facing the similar type of case in hyderabad.
videv says
December 14, 2015 at 10:26 amEvery judgment may not be reported in court’s public records. If you can’t get something, then use facts of that case to create your own precedent; because even that guy created precedent for first time without having similar judgment before, and that’s commendable.
Even having a similar judgment is no guarantee court will order in your favour. If that was so simple, one could just hand over few judgments to lawyer and relax. That’s what many people seem to be doing, but that’s moronic. Wife’s lawyer can also give many judgments in her favour, so without good evidence, right stand in court (not doing stupid things like RCR), right presentation of facts and arguments at right time; things won’t go in husband’s favour.
patule dattatraya says
October 27, 2015 at 8:01 pmvery good plz give full judgement
Vikram N Agarwal says
October 11, 2015 at 7:07 pmThe Article is very Good. Your survey is 100% true. Recently i am facing a false domestic violence case filed by my wife. Thank’s for your support for the Pune Court Judgement . Please give Details of the judgement so as it may be helpfull to me in my DV case. Please help me…….
Prasad M says
September 12, 2015 at 10:07 amExcellent judgement. Women are misusing their right.
prakash says
September 3, 2015 at 6:22 pmMaintenance to wife under DV Act rejected by Pune court because she was working earlier, and now spending time chatting on Facebook and Gmail.
Let me know the case details, case no and party name for given case.
Yogesh says
August 8, 2015 at 8:46 pmHow can i get the case number for this case.
Yogesh says
August 8, 2015 at 8:05 pmPerfect Judgement by pune court…… Hats off.
AMIT says
August 4, 2015 at 6:35 pmit would be helpful if the there is a link for judgement of this case…
thanks
arvind kumar arya says
May 29, 2015 at 10:03 amVery good judgement by pune court.
why women after marriage shows shows unconscious about there future…
R HUSBAND R ATM MACHINE OR BLANK CHEQUES FOR WIFES.
IS there no any reaponsibility of wife for women to maintain relations of institution of marriage?
why always people think that all time husbands were wrong?
change mindset we want gender neutral law.
suketu kapuriya says
May 26, 2015 at 11:29 pmintelignet judjment beyond the thoughts…
zakir saifi says
May 24, 2015 at 3:56 pmVerry good