Men Rights India

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » Law Misuse » Rohtak sisters ‘molestation’ case: first media circus, and now investigation circus

Rohtak sisters ‘molestation’ case: first media circus, and now investigation circus

16 Dec 2014 By videv 3 Comments

According to latest news, a local Haryana court has allowed polygraph (lie-detector) test on both 3 boys accused of molestation and the accusers — Rohtak sister duo.

👉(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act 👈

👉(Read Online eBook): Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law👈

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-local-haryana-court-allows-polygraph-test-on-rohtak-sisters-2044217

Consent had been sought from the victims to conduct lie-detector test on them, to which they agreed, the victims’ lawyer told reporters. He said SIT’s investigating officer Manjeet Singh had sought the consent from the victims.

Contrary to people’s opinion that such exercises will bring out the truth quickly into the open, it is an exercise in frustrating the easier and true course of investigation and justice: use information given by eye-witnesses.  When there were eye-witnesses who said in front of cameras for anyone who cared that they did not see any molestation happening, and the fight started over seats, and the girls were the aggressors; why the hell anyone needs to conduct polygraph tests?  If there is a case of murder which happened and 5 people saw it with their eyes, and their statements are very consistent, do you conduct polygraph tests of everyone present on the scene to find out who did the murder?  Or give primary weightage to the eye-witnesses’ account?

Polygraph (lie-detector) tests are unreliable

Polygraph tests are not reliable and nowhere in the world their results can be used as a primary evidence to convict anyone.  Not only that, they are against Article 20(3) of Indian constitution as per SC judgment earlier:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/No-narcoanalysis-test-without-consent-says-SC/articleshow/5892348.cms

“We are of the considered opinion that no individual can be forced and subjected to such techniques involuntarily, and by doing so it amounts to unwarranted intrusion of personal liberty,” a bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan said.

The apex court said that involuntarily subjecting an accused, a suspect or a witness to such techniques violates Article 20 (3) of the Constitution, which prohibits self-incrimination.

Some people may argue that it can help quickly deliver justice.  I think in Aarushi (and Hemraj) murder case, there was evidence like blood all over the place, but the super-investigation agencies in India including CBI could not find anything even after employing all these ‘advanced’ techniques.  When you mess up with the basic evidence, then there is nothing much to be gained by employing such secondary techniques.

Upon reading the information about polygraph tests at Wikipedia, the most interesting thing was that people who were teaching how to pass in lie-detector tests are being prosecuted for obstructing justice!  If these tests were reliable, then there was no way anyone could be taught to beat them!  What’s the use of a lie-detector test if someone can be trained on how to beat them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygraph

By August 2013 the U.S. federal government had begun indicting individuals who stated that they were teaching methods on how to defeat a polygraph test.[37] It investigated Doug Williams, a former police officer from Oklahoma City who conducted courses on how to defeat a polygraph test.[40] Doug Williams stated emphatically that he had never done anything wrong, and he was never arrested, charged or indicted for any crime. A sting was conducted on Chad Dixon, a former little league coach in Indiana who taught methods on how to beat a polygraph tests to up to 100 people throughout the U.S., resulted in him pleading guilty to charges of obstruction and wire fraud. In 2013 federal prosecutors asked the judge to sentence Dixon to one year and nine months, saying that Dixon had “career of criminal deceit” and taught how to defeat a polygraph to applicants to law enforcement jobs, employees of intelligence services, and child molesters.[41]He received an eight month sentence

Also, high reliance on polygraph tests is mostly an American phenomenon.  It was amusing to read statement by ex-CIA director again in Wikipedia article that East Europeans and Asians can beat the polygraph test because unlike Americans, they probably are not raised to tell the truth!

In 1978 Richard Helms, the 8th Director of Central Intelligence, stated that:

“We discovered there were some Eastern Europeans who could defeat the polygraph at any time.   Americans are not very good at it, because we are raised to tell the truth and when we lie it is easy to tell we are lying. But we find a lot of Europeans and Asiatics [who] can handle that polygraph without a blip, and you know they are lying and you have evidence that they are lying.”[32]

Susan McCarthy of Salon said in 2000 that “The polygraph is an American phenomenon, with limited use in a few countries, such as Canada, Israel and Japan”[33]

So we are in India, part of Asia, not known highly for telling truth, and known for high levels of corruption at all levels of society; and we want to rely on polygraph tests to find the truth!

READ:  Newspaper report is not evidence unless corroborated

The investigation has been fixed.

Links to Free eBooks

1. Download my free PDF eBook Surviving the Legal Jungle

2. Read this FREE eBook written by fathers involved in child custody issues (Read Online) (PDF book)

3. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Read Online)

Links to Paid eBooks/Books


1. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

2. Self-study Book on Divorce for Men (Digital eBook Only)

3. Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

Related Posts

  1. After Rohtak sisters episode, Haryana women’s commission wants to prosecute women for filing false cases!

Filed Under: Law Misuse Tagged With: Evidence, Investigation, Molestation

Comments

  1. Raja says

    June 7, 2016 at 11:15 am

    1. Now a days many false cases and misuse of section 354A by girls . Government must need to make the law fare and it should not be used to misuse by any girl to defame any innocent person.
    This section has provision that , any girl can lodge the FIR even for past /back dated incident in the any other reason fit of range and section says even if girl says that men has touched him inappropriately that too without any witness, then after also police shall arrest the person without investigation and keep in police custody and then person will have to apply for the bail and incase that is holiday or if too late in eve then he will have to remain in police custody throughout night without given him a chance to prove his innocence .

    2.Another notably point in this , that any girl can use this section 354 A , wherein no any damages to girl image as she can simply say that boy touched inappropriately or even starred at her with wrong intension.

    3. Most encouraging provision for girl to misuse this law by girl to defame any innocent , since after FIR , she even need not to hire the advocate nor she have to attend the trial , so she has nothing to loose by false complaint /misuse , and only sufferer is the person against whom she use section 354A.

    4. Does law make thought about this while writing such law??

    5. I came across such case in my relation and hence sharing this .. Any suggestion advise for such open misuse of this section 354A?

    Reply
    • videv says

      June 7, 2016 at 1:45 pm

      >>Any suggestion advise for such open misuse of this section 354A?

      Misuse is openly done of course, and though police is aware of it too, they want to go with the flow, because not going with the flow could mean some 10 women from some women’s NGO sitting on dharna in front of PS tomorrow, and name of police official in newspapers, and then the first thing senior police does is taking action against the junior police officer, even though the junior has done the right thing.

      Our whole police/investigation system, and judiciary needs lot more resources/people and reforms so that meritorious people move ahead and corrupt are shown the door. I doubt there is any quick fix to prevent misuse of only particular laws.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Truth is out: 'Braveheart' Rohtak sisters are third rate bullies and extortion racketeers - Men Rights India says:
    February 22, 2015 at 1:49 pm

    […] Feb 27, 2015: As I had already asserted, the polygraph tests were done to protect the Rohtak sister duo, and that’s exactly how the case is turning out to be.  If the lie-detector tests had gone […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines (for quick guidance only):
(Be respectful to volunteers, & we don't advise on divorce)

1. Kannada/Hindi/English: +919738010456
2. Tamil/English: +919962514226

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups for FREE guidance/discussion

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


👉(Read Online eBook)👈
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Today’s Popular Posts

  • Tax evasion report has to be made public after investigation
  • How to file objections/written statement to…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell
  • Strategy for Child Custody for Men
  • Dowry givers to be prosecuted – Delhi sessions court
  • Right of daughter-in-law in in-laws’ property…
  • Divorce made easier, or rather possible – but watch out!
  • How an NRI man fought false 498a, 406 cases within 6 months
  • Mumbai HC waives 6 month waiting period in mutual divorce
  • How to handle allegation of impotence by wife

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

Husband can’t rape wife, but you can marry woman you raped!

11 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Brain-deficient police treats live-in relationship as rape!

30 May 2010 By videv 16 Comments

Government proposes making IPC 498A compoundable

12 Mar 2015 By videv 1 Comment

Feminists continue the slow kill on Dr Pachauri of TERI

26 Feb 2015 By videv 2 Comments

Hillary Clinton’s letter to Indian women: more lies

31 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • videv on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • Raghu on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • videv on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • P2 on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Child visitation monitor New Haven on Strategy for Child Custody for Men

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts