Men Rights India

Fight against Legal Terrorism

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » Law Misuse » False rape by model against Mumbai DIG Sunil Paraskar falls flat

False rape by model against Mumbai DIG Sunil Paraskar falls flat

5 Aug 2014 By videv 1 Comment

Usually some MRAs feel sense of delight when a false sexual harassment or 498a/DV case gets filed against the godfathers in Indian society: the police, judiciary, politicians etc.  The idea being that once these godfathers feel the heat of false cases, they just might do something for the aam-aadmi and mango people of the country.

👉(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act 👈

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Rape-allegation-against-Maharashtra-top-cop-Sunil-Paraskar-is-for-publicity-Models-ex-lawyer/articleshow/39690642.cms

MUMBAI: In a new turn to the rape and molestation case against IPS officer Sunil Paraskar, a former lawyer of the alleged victim, a model-turned-actress, has said she never told him about the rape and claimed she brought up the charge to gain publicity to enter a reality show.

Below is video on YouTube by a news channel which shows the conversation between accuser and her previous lawyer.  The false rape accuser is asking for bad publicity instead of harassment, but little does our princess know that in today’s social environment and media, even if you allege a man stared at you in a certain way, an IPC 376 might just be on the plate!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yx4i7v81hQY

Model’s former lawyer Rizwan Siddiqui said he quit the case as he got the feeling that the case was filed for publicity.

“My client (model) kept changing her statements. She didn’t share entire information with me. I got the feeling that client was filing case for publicity. So, I backed out of the case,” he said.

As regards the former lawyer, based on the conversation in the video, it is extremely doubtful if the woman has been victim of a crime or a civil wrong.  You don’t talk about media and bad publicity when you have been wronged, you approach police or civil courts!

In the CCTV footage, authenticity of which India Today cannot confirm, the model and the lawyer were seen discussing the case. The model was apparently talking to the lawyer about creating a big controversy so that she is chosen for a reality show that features controversial people as contestants.

The model in the footage was also seen as saying that she wanted to harass the officer. She also wanted to defame Poonam Pandey.

The whatsapp messages leaked by another news show the intentions of this model:

http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/celebrity/zee-media-exclusive-whatsapp-chat-reveals-all-in-dig-paraskar-case_159564.html

On July 10, 7:40 am, the model messaged Rizwan, expressing her displeasure over casting of a popular reality TV show, for which she along with Poonam Pandey are reportedly vying. She wrote, “Sunil Paraskar is not replying, now he will be off on a vacation. The casting for the TV show has started already. Either she will be taken in or me. We both can`t be offered the show, as we fall in the same category. For past two years, both of us have been getting dropped at the last moment. Let`s see what happens this year.”

On July 14, 9:04 pm, the model says, “We can`t really file any case against Paraskar. Suppose, if I say that there is an affair between Paraskar and Poonam. And if I leak the email conversation that I had with him over this thing, can he file a case against me?”

On July 15, 10:14 am, she messaged, “Call me whenever you get free. I have to push this news fast.”

The model had last chatted with Rizwan on July 21 and not even once `rape` was mentioned in her messages. It was only after the lawyer excused himself from the controversial case, the model in the last week of July decided to come up with the rape and molestation charges bid against the DIG.

The case may not be over yet, but as I say whenever a woman says that she was raped over a period of few months and few years, unless she has been enslaved or trafficked, it is bound to be a false rape case.

READ:  Rohtak sisters ‘molestation’ case: first media circus, and now investigation circus

So someone in this case got bad publicity.  It is a man Sunil Paraskar whose name was thrown all over media and the women empowerment waalas, the candle holding crowd, and the official women protector agencies like Maharashtra state women commission got active demanding things like suspension of the IPS officer pending investigation of the case.  E.g.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/suspend-rapeaccused-dig-paraskar-demands-maharashtra-state-womens-commission/article6280308.ece

The Commission also raised apprehension about Mr. Paraskar’s reasons for denying to undergo a lie detector test. Mr. Paraskar had told a Mumbai court recently that he will not be unable to appear for a lie detector test as his medical condition does not allow him to do so. He had claimed he has undergone a bypass surgery, making it difficult for him to give the test.

Let’s see.  The person who alleges “I was raped over a period of few years”, does not undergo any lie detector test.  Her identity is a closely guarded secret and it is required by the law too.  But the man’s reputation is destroyed terming him as ‘rapist’.

All these so called technical rapes are basically an affront to genuine rape victims, and the genuine cases and convictions are disappearing fast given rise in false rape cases after the Dec 16, 2002 Nirbhaya case.  The Hindu has recently published an excellent study of rape cases in Delhi – the false rape capital of India.

http://m.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/rape-cases-scripted-firs-fail-court-test/article6268958.ece/

The Hindu found that one-fifth of the cases were wound up because the complainant did not appear or turned hostile. Of the cases fully tried, over 40% dealt with consensual sex, usually involving the elopement of a young couple and the girl’s parents subsequently charging the boy with rape. Another 25% dealt with “breach of promise to marry”. Of the 162 remaining cases, men preying on young children in slums was the most common type of offence.

23% conviction rate

The ostensible reason given for registering every such complaint as rape under IPC 376 is that if it is not done, it will discourage other victims to come forward!  Seriously, when the rape conviction rate is only 23% in Delhi in 2013, and news like this one are being shown on TV 24X7, why would a genuine rape victim feel encouraged to come forward, when she realizes a good chance of being treated as one of the other 77%!

Some in media have got the sense to question the wisdom in blindly believing every reported rape case to be like the Nirbhaya episode.

Picture 

As a first, the name and photo of this model should be made public.   This is a must to protect all men in future who might come in contact with this unscrupulous criminal woman.

This model (and her previous lawyer) should be investigated and prosecuted under relevant provisions of IPC in trying to get a man punished by filing a false case.  Such provisions exist in the criminal law but are rarely used in India, and against women especially.  It has already been done in several false rape cases as outlined in my earlier article.  The time has come to send a strong message to the people who want to use rape as an extortion and enrichment tool.

Questions about this Article?

Ask in Telegram Group Men Rights India Q&A  (Also include link to this Article when you post question)

👉Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony

Related Posts

  1. Mumbai High court gives anticipatory bail in IPC 376 ‘technical’ rape allegation
  2. Delhi Sessions Court raises question about dignity of falsely accused men in rape cases
  3. Another rape for non-marriage scam!
  4. Marital rape not a crime in India… yawn, being a married man can be though!

Filed Under: Law Misuse Tagged With: False Rape, IPC 376, Police

Comments

  1. Sam says

    August 30, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Aam aadami pe jab jhoote case dalate hai tab Police ko bada maja aata hai… Khudpar bhi case ho jaye tab samaj me aayega…

    Rishwatkhor Indian Police..

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines:

👉Kannada/ Hindi/ English: Call Sharath +919738010456
👉Free guidance (10-15 min)
👉Paid Guidance (For 30 min or more), click to pay

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India


Take Quizzes to test your legal knowledge!

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


👉(Read Online eBook)👈
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Contribute via UPI: videv@upi / videv@icici / videv@paytm

Today’s Popular Posts

  • How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC…
  • How to complain against judges of trial courts, High…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell,…
  • How to handle allegation of impotence by wife
  • Basic Cross-examination techniques in matrimonial…
  • Email addresses of prominent journalists and newspapers
  • IPC 498A bare act
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce,…
  • Guidelines of WhatsApp and Facebook group and sessions
  • About the book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance…

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

General RTI tactics

24 Jul 2009 By videv Leave a Comment

Mandatory uploading of FIRs to state police websites – SC judgment to protect rights of accused

30 Apr 2019 By videv Leave a Comment

Addresses to post letters/faxes to

18 Oct 2009 By videv Leave a Comment

What to do if maintenance amount is more than your income/salary

1 Oct 2014 By videv 8 Comments

Practical techniques in filing RTI applications

2 Apr 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • Rajesh on Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance, divorce etc.
  • DHAVAL JOAHI on Visitation rights – 1
  • videv on Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell, counselling/mediation etc
  • videv on Complaint against male abuse in Asian Paints Damp Proof advertisement -advertiser advised by ASCI to modify or remove it
  • Gurpreet Singh on Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell, counselling/mediation etc

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
    • Free and Paid eBooks on Law Basics, Maintenance, Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts