Men Rights India

  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts
You are here: Home » Uncategorized » CrPC 340 procedure cannot be bypassed by trial court

CrPC 340 procedure cannot be bypassed by trial court

25 Feb 2010 By videv 23 Comments

This Punjab and Haryana High court  judgment says that if an application under CrPC 340 is moved (for filing false affidavit in this case), then the court must undertake the procedure for CrPC 340 in disposing that application.  It was not correct on part of trial court to refer cursorily to the mentioned fact of false affidavit in judgment, and thus dismissing the CrPC 340 application by being silent on the issue.

👉(Read Online eBook): How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act 👈

👉(Read Online eBook): Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law👈

So the takeaway for people facing false 498a and maintenance cases is to go for perjury application under CrPC 340 if you have good evidence like false affidavit, wrongly mentioned fact about not-working, wrong salary mentioned etc.

——————————————————————————–
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1512317/

CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M) 1  IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH                               CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M)

Date of decision: 25-1-2010

Sunny Bhumbla ………Appellant Vs

Shashi ………Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARBANS LAL

Present: Shri K.S.Boparai, Advocate, for the appellant. HARBANS LAL, J.

This appeal is directed against the order dated 5.12.2008 Annexure P-1 passed by the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Saheed Bhagat Singh Nagar vide which he allowed the petition moved under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, for restitution of conjugal rights leaving the parties to bear their own costs and rejected the application moved under Section 195/340 Cr.P.C.

I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant, besides perusing the record with due care and circumspection. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted with great eloquence that after the respondent admitted in her cross-examination about her employment, salary and inheritance
of the landed property, she again placed on record another affidavit dated 27.8.2008 solemnly affirming therein that she had inadvertently not mentioned about the source of income as well as employment in the earlier affidavit dated 14.8.2008. Thereafter the appellant moved an application under Section 195 of Cr.P.C.
for initiating proceedings against the respondent for submitting a
false affidavit CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M) 2 before the learned trial Court, in order to get more maintenance from the appellant. The learned trial Court had assured the appellant that his said application shall be decided alongwith the main case. While deciding the main petition, in paragraph No. 13 of the judgment it has been observed that “in support of her claim for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the
respondent/applicant had made certain assertions, which were found to be totally false and the same had apparently been done by her in a deliberate manner. Consequently even an application for initiating suitable proceedings against her on account of her having submitted a false affidavit was also filed
by the petitioner on 3.9.2008. Thereafter, the respondent did not press her claim for interim maintenance, but the same did not absolve her of the liability of the aforesaid lapse. This court, however, does not wish to initiate any such proceedings against the respondent with the hope that sooner or later, the parties may be in a position to resolve their dispute or else this young couple may adopt such other means so that they can part their ways
in a peaceful manner and therefore, with a view to avoid undue complication of the matrimonial dispute, no action on account of submitting of the above false affidavit etc. is being initiated against the respondent.”

READ:  Delhi police stations (and CAW?) to be covered by CCTV as per Supreme Court order

It is further argued that the learned trial Court has overlooked
the fact that the respondent has used the false affidavit in the judicial
proceedings. Therefore, all the ingredients of the offences of cheating,
forging and perjury etc. are made out and consequently, the order passed by the
learned trial Court in not initiating the proceedings under Section 195 read
with Section 340 Cr.P.C. is illegal.

CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M) 3 I have given a deep and thoughtful
consideration to these submissions.

A careful perusal of the observations rendered by the learned trial
Court in paragraph No. 13 of the impugned judgment would reveal that there is
not even a shred of reference to the application moved under Section 195 read
with Section 340 Cr.P.C. This apart, no specific reasons have been apportioned
for not initiating the action on the basis of the alleged affidavit. The said
application having been moved under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure was required to be disposed of separately. It was not desirable on the part of the learned trial Court to decide the said application in a slip shod manner by making mere passing reference to the alleged affidavit.
In the application moved under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. if the Court deems fit, the inquiry has to be held whereas in the present one, the impugned order is
absolutely silent as to whether or not inquiry was held. There is specific
procedure which is to be followed while disposing of an application moved under
Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Section 340 of the Criminal
Procedure Code reads as under:-

“340.Procedure in cases mentioned in Sec.195–(1) When, upon an
application made to it in this behalf or otherwise any Court is of the opinion
that it is expedient in the interest of justice that an inquiry should be made
into any offence referred to to in cl (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 195,
which appears to have been committed in or in relation to to a proceeding in
that Court, or as the case may be, in respect of of a document produced or
given in evidence in a proceeding in that Court, CRA No. 197 SB of 2010 (O&M) 4
such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary.

(a) record a finding to that effect.

(b) make a complaint thereof in writing

(c) send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction.

(d) take sufficient security for the appearance of the accused before
such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non- bailable and the Court
thinks it necessary so to do, send the accused in custody to such Magistrate;
and (e) bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such
Magistrate.

(2) The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an
offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under
sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the
making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court
is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of Sec.195.

READ:  Prenuptial discussion reports in Ministry of WCD - more women empowerment, nothing to safeguard or protect men

(3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed (a)
where the Court making complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the Court
as the Court may appoint.

(b) in any other case, by the presiding officer of the Court,
and            (4) In this section, “Court” has the same meaning as in CRA No.
197 SB of 2010 (O&M) 5 Sec.195.”

A glance through the impugned order would reveal that the learned
trial Court has given a go by to the provisions of Section 340 Cr.P.C. The
approach adopted by the learned trial Court is unwholesome and is depreciable.

The impugned order is absolutely silent as to whether the application has been dismissed or allowed, if so for which reasons. In consequence of the preceding discussion the trial Court is directed to decide the application under discussion in accordance with law. This appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

(HARBANS LAL)

JUDGE

January 25, 2010

RSK

NOTE: Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes/No

Links to Free eBooks

1. Download my free PDF eBook Surviving the Legal Jungle

2. Read this FREE eBook written by fathers involved in child custody issues (Read Online) (PDF book)

3. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Read Online)

Links to Paid eBooks/Books


1. How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

2. Self-study Book on Divorce for Men (Digital eBook Only)

3. Alimony and Maintenance under Hindu Law (Digital eBook) (Print Paperback)

Related Posts

  1. Applicability of section 340 of CrPC, and 194 of IPC etc

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: CrPC 340

Comments

  1. Mahesh says

    October 10, 2020 at 11:05 am

    Can send CRPC 340 application by speed Post to court
    I unable to attend physical in court for submit crpc 340 application

    Reply
    • videv says

      October 12, 2020 at 5:10 pm

      No. The whole procedural law will not change because of one person’s special situation.

      Reply
  2. Arun G Kumar says

    September 23, 2020 at 3:37 pm

    1. Will false allegations of Impotency amounts to perjury.
    2. Wife has claimed my fathers salary as Rs. 1,50,000/- and also that he is giving me 25,000 every month but my father salary is just Rs. 20,000 will it amounts to perjury
    3. And on there request I had stayed with my wife in her home for first two months but she has claimed that I visted once in fifteen days to hide the harassement done to me by her mother, I have my google maps timeline data and transactions made at petrol bunks and other places, will it amounts to perjury

    Thanks in advance

    Reply
    • videv says

      September 26, 2020 at 11:34 am

      Perjury applicable only on statements made in an affidavit on oath and notarized.

      1. Yes if you have proof of wife admitting in past that you are not impotent.

      2. Yes if you have proof that wife had earlier said different amount than 1.5 lakh of father’s salary. Same for 25K

      3. Yes it could, though how many people are able to appreciate electronic evidence like google maps timeline is a question mark. Transactions proofs will help and they are easily understood.

      Reply
  3. Pankaj Prajapati says

    June 2, 2019 at 1:36 pm

    My wife filed on me false cases section 12 DV case, section 498A , section 125crpc ,and section 9 . She gave false statement on affidavit that she was not working but actually she was working and I have submitted evidence documentary proof in court of her job.Now I have filed perjury 340 CRPC read with section 195 IPC successfully on her in DV case.
    Please advice what to do now.
    My 498A mediation is still running and she want alimony more than 7 Lac.
    Please advice.
    – What happen after filing 340 CRPC
    – What is the effect in all cased of Perjury.
    – 340 CRPC Notice and summon already issued to Wife.
    – One more case from my mother side file on her and his father section 323, 504 and 506 evidence already (CD) already submit in court and court issue non-bailable warrant to her and her Father.
    Kindly Advice what to do now.

    Reply
    • videv says

      June 7, 2019 at 3:42 pm

      Continue pursuing CrPC 340. If summons sent, then it means magistrate has started the criminal trial. Max 7 year jail to wife is possible.

      Your mother’s case on OP: PP will take care of it mostly, though you should keep aware of the status of case, by getting certified copies of latest order sheets.

      Usually when a good perjury case exists, wife side is forced to come to settlement, or else she can enjoy the prospect of facing criminal trial followed by jail term. No need to pay any alimony etc to wife (assuming no child), instead go with attitude that you deserve to get compensation for false cases, perjury etc filed her her.

      Reply
  4. F4D says

    April 28, 2019 at 4:58 pm

    1. Suppressed employment history in the petition (125CrPC) and chief affidait. Not even mentioed that she wasn’t or was working and unable to maintain herself. But accepted all the previous jobs. income in the cross.
    2. Submitted bills of child day care with “Online Payment mentioed on it” for school A (mentioned on bill). Name of the scool A was changed to school B overlapping the duration for which the bills are produced. On asking in CE about bank statements from which online payment were paid, nothing was produced. On asking whether you are aware about change of the name of the school, answer was “Yes”. Accepted that Day Owner is her friend
    3. She said she isn’t aware if any such accounts exist on asking about depositing money from her current employer in the bank account in the name of her(maiden name) and her father (which is in operative and 10-15 years old). She also said, her father is working there. Later in respondent witness, the bank manager produced the bank statement and the it shows account is in her and her father name and money is being depostied from the said employer. Employer is yet to enter the witness box. Yet need to prove that she and the acount holder is the same person and the money deposited is against her employment and not her father. These should be in records in next couple of hearings

    Should I go for Perjury?

    Reply
    • videv says

      May 10, 2019 at 3:04 pm

      Since she has accepted her income in the cross, the fact about denying about bank account may weaken case for perjury. Had she said that she has no job/no income currently, and THEN it is proven through bank account statement, employer testimony that she indeed is working and getting money, then it is fit case for perjury.

      Also, one yardstick for perjury is that the lie told to court should be of nature that it can materially affect outcome of case in favour of perjurer. So in maintenance case, a lie of the nature that wife is not working when she is actually working will be 100% fit for perjury, and many such cases have been successful. But another kind of lie can be of a degree when wife says that her salary is 35K when it is actually 40K. Such a lie may be deemed to not materially affect merits of the case except to a degree since the lie is about a relatively smaller amount of 5K out of 40K. But if the wife says her salary is 20K when it is 40K, again perjury should be filed and pursued vigorously because the amount told is so much lower than the actual amount that it can materially affect the final order/outcome.

      Reply
  5. Subir Roy says

    December 12, 2018 at 11:09 pm

    My wife said to the court that she was tried to be killed at 4 pm but in doctors injury report she was treated at 1.30 pm on same day corroborating witness of doctor. And two other witness said that case was registered on 27.04.15 whereas actual date of case registration was 13.11.15. Now case ended with acquittal on 8.8.18. If case u/s 340 crpc possible?

    Reply
    • videv says

      December 16, 2018 at 4:14 pm

      Witnesses statement may not be basis of perjury case since it may be said that they may have forgotten, or maybe they were not real witnesses, but police/IO had put their statement just to make the case for a prima-facie credible chargesheet.

      Point about doctor treating at 130 pm suggests wife’s statement is incorrect as regards to timing, but doesn’t say that it’s a false statement altogether. So it doesn’t seem material enough to attract perjury.

      About possibility of filing CrPC 340 after disposal of case:

      I could not find anything definitive by way of case law on this. On bare reading of CrPC 340 and offences under CrPC 195, it doesn’t seem there is any bar on filing perjury case after disposal of case.

      CrPC 340: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/908644/

      CrPC 195: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/621703/

      In CrPC 195, the word used is ‘proceeding’. Whether the meaning of word proceeding is restricted to pending case only or includes disposed cases also, is not clear.

      Reply
  6. Saurabh says

    July 25, 2018 at 2:51 pm

    Sir,
    I have in a case with very influential people who have taken ex partite stay in civil case on my address and My neighbours name in 2016.court has remained vacated for six months and they have also not submitted a letter to extend stay and as per the lawyers the stay is not there as on last date they have not put up an application for extension of stay.The questionaire send by me for clearification of stay if it is there or not has not answered in yes or no and says see certified copy,
    One more lawyer asked the same so the concerned person refused to answer the questionaire.Kindly advice if there is a way to get a clear reply if there is a stay or not.Kindly advice a procedure in which they can be forced to reply what all are my options and ways to get the questionaire answered.it is also important to do this quickly because of some very critical reasons in another case.its a regular suit.Thanks.

    Reply
    • videv says

      July 25, 2018 at 10:25 pm

      These questions can either be answered by your advocate, OR if you don’t believe you are being guided properly; then only option is to start reading relevant sections in Code of Civil Procedure.

      Reply
  7. Saurabh says

    July 23, 2018 at 6:07 pm

    I am facing civil suits in two different courts and there are a lots of false affidavits being filed. The case is in the issue state and in other case the name of party is different but they got ex partite stay.now can I file a separate criminal case under crpc 340 195 and prove their false affidavit.

    Reply
    • videv says

      July 24, 2018 at 9:40 am

      It’s difficult to comment on merit of case, but no need to wait if false affidavit is filed.

      IPC 195 is not applicable in most cases, so don’t just copy-paste for readymade templates online, which seem to be using IPC 195 as catch-all for all CrPC 340 cases. Use the right sections from IPC 191 onwards.

      Section 195 in The Indian Penal Code

      195. Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of offence punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment.

      Reply
  8. Alok says

    February 9, 2018 at 12:44 am

    Can I file an application under 340 in my revision appeal case of maintainance order (u/s 125) given by trail court wherein misleading & wrong information/ facts were put against me. While my income from last 3 years has been around 2lacs pa, other party claimed my income to be 12-15 lacs.

    Reply
    • videv says

      February 11, 2018 at 10:49 pm

      That won’t fall under perjury

      Reply
  9. Muhammad Muneer Mulla says

    August 19, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    On basis of…
    [1] Application U/s 12 of D.V.Act & 20 documents in its support the Applicant-1 filed, and
    [2] writ petition Cri.WP:3685/2013 the Petotioner-1 filed before Hon’ble High Court, and
    [3] supporting 31 documents Petitioner-1’s Learned Advocate has personally filed in very writ petition,

    I am filing an application U/s 340 Cr.P.C. in Cri.Misc.Appl. No.45 of 2012 pointing out to how Applicant-1 and her Learned Advocate as to how …

    (a) concealed relevant material facts like Applicant-1’s Salary Income and Applicant-1’s ownership in TWO flats from Hon’ble Court, (b) suppressed from and did not allow to come relevant material documents like Applicant-1’s Salary Slips & Property papers of TWO flats the Applicant-1 owns before Hon’ble Court, (c) irrelevant documents like her character certificate showing that Applicant-1 had resined in past & her mother’s bank statement showing she had issued cheque of Rd.4,33,333/- and Applicant-1’s loan is cleared. (d) mislead & misrepresented facts to Hon’ble Court, (e) prepared’Bogus’ documents like fake paper workvLeave & License Agreement, (f) filed in court process (g) as evidence (h) for purpose of cheating & (i) well deliberately cheated this respondent (j) and Hon’ble Courts (k) & obtained favourable orders including Ex-party Stay Order, and (l) are are enjoying benefits of their own wrongs.

    I could fortunately got their past criminal records with sound evidences, that they had same & similar crimes in court process and were punished U/s 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC for 3 years rigours imprisonment. Learned Advocate is on bail from Hon,’ble Karnataka High Court.

    I had complained (No.254/2013) against learned advocate before Hon’ble Bar Association, with still no results.

    I had also complained to Hon’ble Prime Minister. On 08.08.2017 Law & Judiciary Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032 have written letter to the Secretary of Bar Council Mumbai ‘for taking necessary action.

    I expect the wrong doers should be punished. And the respondents get justice. It will also be a lesson for those who abuse law.

    Reply
  10. Basalt Kumar Newar says

    August 11, 2017 at 7:13 pm

    Perjury is strong and filed in courts so 340 CrPC filed after dismissal 341 CrPC filed and dismissed is a clear case of corruption as more than 100 rulings of Apex court and H’courts given in written argument. So in my opinion only SLP,case in h’court u/s340(2) CrPC or notice u/s 51A{(h) to all the highest level of India by laws for action immediately.

    Reply
  11. VINAY K PHULPAGAR says

    April 8, 2015 at 10:59 pm

    Respected sir ,

    Recently i am submitting Perjury again my wife in section 191 & 195 ,in crpc340 . Perjury is very strong because she told in oath she is not working & i am submitted PF detail from 2009 to 2014 march.she claimed interim from 2012 November.Rs 1500 per month. recent i loose my job also , i said to judge but judge waiting for his Say(reply)
    Now question is If perjury is strong then why judge waiting for say . give me a concrit judgement emideat stop interim & through the file in dustbin.

    Reply
    • videv says

      April 9, 2015 at 9:41 am

      I can’t say about the specific reason in this case why judge is not giving the order.

      In general, one should remember that men want to be white knights and protector of women, and judges won’t be immune to that psychology either. It is statistically proven that women get lesser punishment for same crimes than men. Google it.

      Many men themselves who approach us don’t seem to have much desire to pursue the case to its logical end, they just want a to know “how to get out of these cases”, maybe because they have hopes of finding another female after their cases are over. That is also known to the System, which wants to milk husbands to the maximum extent but will conveniently find multiple ways of not prosecuting the women/wives for false cases and allegations.

      Reply
    • Gautam says

      March 27, 2017 at 9:01 am

      Did the case reach logical conclusion. I am stuck in a similar case as it’s. And I am putting all my strength to get a perjury verdict. It would help me if you could share the judgement.

      Reply
      • videv says

        March 27, 2017 at 12:05 pm

        Some SC judgments are here on CrPC 340:

        http://bharatlaw.in/search?q=crpc%20340

        Reply
  12. Manish says

    March 16, 2015 at 12:09 pm

    This is very helpful. Thanks a lot.
    Your work is really a morale booster..

    Regards.
    Manish

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Men Rights India numbers For 498A/406/Dowry Case/DV/Maintenance/child custody-visitation/abusive-wife/false cases, CALL volunteers' phone lines (for quick guidance only):
(Be respectful to volunteers, & we don't advise on divorce)

1. Kannada/Hindi/English: +919738010456
2. Tamil/English: +919962514226

Join our WhatsApp/Facebook groups for FREE guidance/discussion

Join Our Telegram Channel for FREE updates

Social

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram

Search this website

Important/Must Read/Permanent Posts

  • How to assess your false case and marriage breakup probability
  • How to take action against police or magistrate for 498A arrest without following CrPC 41 41A?
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • What to do if CAW cell/police/advocate is putting pressure to compromise
  • Innocent until proven guilty is the law, use it!
  • Advice to men on 498a, maintenance, DV, divorce, child custody, what else
  • How to find and manage your lawyer in 498a, DV, CrPC 125, divorce, RCR cases
  • How to fight false cases of DV, Maintenance, CrPC 125, 498a etc
  • How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Notes and questions on court procedures
  • What should be my stand in court?
  • Understanding the divorce industry in India

Book: How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125 and DV Act


👉(Read Online eBook)👈
(Buy Print book)
(Buy Digital eBook)
(Information about the Book)

Today’s Popular Posts

  • How to file objections/written statement to…
  • How to complain against judges of trial courts, High…
  • Advice to women on IPC 498a, DV case, maintenance,…
  • Procedure of CAW (Crime against women) cell
  • Section 41, 41A, 41B of CrPC which govern arrest by…
  • Why Indian men should be very careful in filing divorce
  • Basic Cross-examination techniques in matrimonial…
  • How to draft a child custody (GWC) petition
  • How to Fight and Reduce Maintenance under CrPC 125…
  • How to fight false cases of DV, maintenance, CrPC…

Tags

498A Activism Arrest Child Support Child_Custody_Visitation Commando Gyan Commando Strategy Commando Techniques CrPC CrPC 125 Cruelty Divorce Domestic Violence Industry Dowry DV Act Judgments Evidence False Case False Rape Family Law Feminazis Feminist Figures Feminist Propaganda Fight Back HC Judgment Hindu Marriage Act HMA 24 Law Making Law Misuse Laws Legal Info live-in Maintenance Marriage Men Rights NCW NRI Police Press Release PWDVA(DV Act) Rape RTI SC Judgment Supreme Court WCD Women Reservation Bill

The Benefits of Reading Men Rights India!

before reading MRI
Before


after reading MRI
After

email: I am facing false DV case. I love your blog. It really have me boost to fight this case and I feel so happy that you guys are doing such a commendable work.


comment: Your survey is 100 % true. whatever is written in this blog matches more than 90 % of my marriage life situation.


comment: The Article is really great, it’s actually happening in my life. whatever is mentioned here is the tactics are used by my wife and still going on….


comment: This is a very good article, and some points mentioned here are the real reasons males are threatened to shell out the maintenance amount


comment: This document is very help for me,becoise i am sufring for false dowry case and fiting for them.so thank for to u.


comment: The web content is very useful for its diversity and especially for atrocities committed upon men, emitting a clarion call for them to rise and defend their rights and hood.


comment: Thanks you People doing very may allah grant you Success. Ameen.


comment: This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. Your work is really a morale booster..
Search judgments at Bharat Law
Read judgments at Bharat Law
IPC 498A Judgments
IPC 406 Judgments
DV Act Judgments
CrPC 125 Judgments
Child Custody Judgments

Author on Facebook

Vivek Deveshwar

Free eBook: Surviving the Legal Jungle

Surviving-the-Legal-Jungle-Cover-Image

Featured Posts

Email addresses of Rajya Sabha MPs

2 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Man accused of rape has to settle with ‘victim’

1 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Delhi High Court does historical justice to women by invoking the constitution

23 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Madras HC relies on Rajasthan HC judgment in HMA 24 case

4 Mar 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Old couple blame misuse of dowry law for losing house

17 Apr 2010 By videv Leave a Comment

Equality for Men – Myth or Reality?

Download IMD handbook
Download IMD handbook

Recent Comments

  • videv on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • Raghu on How to get Provident Fund (PF) details of wife
  • videv on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • P2 on How to assess maintenance amount likely to be ordered in CrPC 125 or HMA 24
  • Child visitation monitor New Haven on Strategy for Child Custody for Men

RSS Feeds

  • All Posts
  • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
  • 498A Judgments

Archives

Copyright © 2009-2021 · Vivek Deveshwar · Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Bare Acts
    • IPC 498A bare act
    • CrPC 125 Bare Act
    • The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – bare act
    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Bare Act
  • 498a
    • 498a Tips
    • 498a Info
    • 498a Judgments
  • DV Act
    • DV Act Tips
    • DV Act Info
    • DV Act Judgments
  • Maintenance
    • Maintenance CrPC 125 Judgments
    • Maintenance HMA 24 Judgments
  • Child Custody
    • Child Custody Visitation Judgments
    • Child Custody Visitation News
  • Misc
    • Divorce Judgments
    • Law Misuse
    • Marriage
    • Misandry
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Important Posts